Template talk:Power Rangers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Episodes
"List of all Power Rangers episodes" should probably be somehow included with the episodes listed under "Key Episodes". Whereas combining the two makes sense, doing so as they are now would be kinda messy (i.e. "List of all Power Rangers episodes" shouldn't fall under a category called "Key Episodes" -- needs re-wording). Any suggestions? JPG-GR 06:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'll make some changes (since I don't know what they'll exactly be yet) and then maybe you can look them over? Ryūlóng 06:46, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- That looks good. The only thing that still causes an underlying irritation is having Zords in the see also section. It almost feels as if it goes with the "Characters", but on second glance, that seems downright silly. Other than that, it feels good. JPG-GR 18:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, Zords don't really go anywhere else...that I can think of. Ryūlóng 01:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- That looks good. The only thing that still causes an underlying irritation is having Zords in the see also section. It almost feels as if it goes with the "Characters", but on second glance, that seems downright silly. Other than that, it feels good. JPG-GR 18:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dino Thunder
I think there are too many dino thunder episodes on here can we come to a consensus to only about three on here. candyo32
- Well, many fans believe Dino Thunder was important, seeing as they brought Tommy back. And this place isn't a very good place to make such suggestions. No one knows about this template. Ryūlóng 23:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- What template? I don't see no stinkin' template! ;) JPG-GR 22:16, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Selection of Episodes
Going through this template, reading article to article, I feel there are some episodes lacking. The most glaring so far would have to be "A Zeo Beginning." As MMPR ended quite abruptly (and finally), it seems only logical to start it up again with an article on AZB. One could also make arguments for MVatMA. On the other hand, this is quite clearly a slippery slope, as nearly any 3+-parter could be article worthy, and I've no time to write any from scratch (and, perhaps more accurately, no time to dig out the appropriate tapes to re-watch). Just food for thought. JPG-GR 05:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
