User talk:Post Falls Man

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Please inform me of any comments or complaints.


Welcome!

Hello, Post Falls Man, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Also, I notice your contributions are made without citing any references nor sources. Please see WP:V for more 222.153.162.182 05:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Rimmington

This was an article about a non-notable feature of Runescape. It might be better off in a Runescape Wiki rather than this online encyclopedia.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  05:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Micronation of Gemnoviag

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Micronation of Gemnoviag. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please see WP:NOT, WP:N, and WP:V. NawlinWiki 00:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Royal family. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. –- kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 08:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - Lucky 6.9 08:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Your modification of the article on Planets is noted. ~~

[edit] More vandalism

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Republic of Gemnoviag, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to 1869, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to July 14, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

FYI, I have corrected your vandalism to 1869 and July 14, and have nominated Republic of Gemnoviag for deletion. Do not portray obvious fiction as reality on Wikipedia. PubliusFL 17:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gemnoviag

On my talk page, you stated: Gemnoviag is a nation in the middle of Europe it is mensioned in the Liechtenstein Web-Site in german aka "www.liechtenstein.li" And has close ties with the Austrian government which was mensioned once in 1958 in the Austrian news paper possibly still on record in the Austrian Database of news of past importance no website is currently known by me.. but you get the message you should look farther into your research by looking up more "worldly" information. You don't know everything and neither does Google or Yahoo or any other main search base. You're not going to fool anyone that easily. Google Scholar, Google Books, and Google News all give zero results for Gemnoviag. None of these are English-only resources. A search for Gemnoviag on the site you referred to (the Liechtenstein site) gives the result "Es wurden keine Dokumente gefunden." That means "there were no documents found." As the creator of the article, it is your responsibility to back it up with reliable, verifiable sources, or to stop making the claims. PubliusFL 21:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

If you are Prince of Gemnoviag, you ought to know what reliable sources are out there to document your principality, eh? Doesn't it seem a little implausible that a resident of Post Falls would be a ruling European prince? PubliusFL 00:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm afraid you're not fooling anyone, and if you persist in attempting to perpetuate an obvious hoax, as you did with your latest edits to Republic of Gemnoviag (restricted government site?), I am likely to seek admin intervention. PubliusFL 01:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Colonization of Pluto

Please don't remove the "unreferenced" tag - it serves to alert editors that an article needs some form of citation in order to support the text. This shouldn't be interpreted as a critique of the subject, only as a notice to ensure that deficiencies are addressed in a timely fashion. --Ckatzchatspy 01:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

You have to provide proof that the material in the article is true, and verifiable. That means supplying links to sources - books, articles, websites - that fit under Wikipedia's guidelines for citations. I don't know what web site you're referring to (as it's not listed in the article) but generally speaking it has to be a reputable source, not a blog or a personal page. Hope this helps. --Ckatzchatspy 01:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re-creation of Gemnoviag

A tag has been placed on Gemnoviag, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please do not keep recreating pages in violation of Wikipedia's policies. -- PubliusFL 07:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/o/s/User_talk%7EPost_Falls_Man_c496.html"