Talk:Postulates of special relativity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. | |
|
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
I edited the "Postulates of special relativity" after reading this article on PhysOrg.com
http://www.physorg.com/news11829.html
One of the points that Baierlein makes, is that relativity is generally taught using a version of the second postulate which is far less intuitively plausible than the the second postulate as originally formulated by Einstein.
--- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.163.106.133 (talk • contribs).
[edit] User:Der alte Hexenmeister
It seems that Der alte Hexenmeister (talk • contribs) may be the person known on UseNet newsgroups by such handles as Androcles and Hexenmeister (google on this handles with group:sci.physics.relativity). The first edits of this new WP user unfortunately violated a number of policies; I just noted some of the violations on his user talk page. Please help us monitor to make sure he follows our behavioral rules in future.---CH 04:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
