Talk:Portola Valley, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of the San Francisco Bay Area WikiProject, a collaborative effort to build a more detailed guide on Wikipedia's coverage of San Francisco and the Bay Area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is supported by WikiProject Cities, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Cities on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This page has some painfully obvious errors that I don't exactly know how to address other than bringing up in this discussion page. Firstly, it needs to cite its source for the 2000 census. That leads to the second problem. Am I the only one to seriously doubt that the average male yearly income is zero dollars, whereas the average female yearly income is just over 92,000 dollars? I know many male workers in Portola Valley anyways so this is clearly false. I'd be much obliged if someone could locate the original source for this data and correct this horrendous factual error.

The error has been fixed. The problem was that the US Census data listed the male income at 100,000+, whereas the bot that was used to fill in the data was expecting a number without any extra symbols. BlankVerse 22:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)