Talk:Ponerinae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve and expand Wikipedia's coverage of arthropods. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] From PNA/Biology

• Ponerinae - see talk page, needs editing for layman. rhyax 06:41, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

moved from cleanup (no longer accessible except by page history; see [1] [2] and [3]):

"This one needs some serious clarification. It was obviously written BY an entomologist FOR entomologists...and possibly one with some literacy issues. The sentence structure in the second paragraph was totally screwed. I tried to fix it, but the part where he talks about "These two evolutionary developments" was not possible to parse with any certainty...was he talking about the ones that preceded or the ones that followed? If he was talking about the ones that followed (in the same sentence, based on the placement of periods...and there really wasn't anything else to go on in determining where the sentences began or ended...there was no structure), why only show contrast?

"Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but Wikipedia is intended to be readable by laymen in any field that it covers, correct? The author's other pages aren't so bad, so no crusade to clean this stuff up is needed, but damn. At first I thought it was just the technical jargon...and that is pretty nasty in this one...but wow." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Andy Christ (talk • contribs) 17:06, 4 June 2004 (UTC)

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ed Cormany (talk • contribs) 21:07, 4 June 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup

There is a lot of information here that I think would be clearer if divided appropriately; such as putting the information on the Poneramorph Group in a seperate article. And limiting this article to the current information of the Ponerinae sub-family. I'm going to work some on this, please post suggestionsWynler 22:54:18, 2005-08-29 (UTC)

Moved most of the info to the more appropriate Poneromorph subfamilies article.--Wynler | Talk 19:36, 21 March 2006 (UTC)