User:Pmanderson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pmanderson. |
I have found the following long list links useful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Use English
- Wikipedia:Featured articles
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view:Articles without bias describe debates fairly rather than advocating any side of the debate.
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Village pump
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:Current surveys
- Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion
- WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox
- Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point especially the recognition that WP is inconsistent.
- wannabe_kate
Feel free to contact me here.
(A word of advice; it makes no sense, but you will get more respect if you create your user page).
Contents |
[edit] Prejudices (First Series)
[edit] Wikipedia is inconsistent
I am opposed to all efforts to impose uniformity on Wikipedia; imposition of national or political PoV are the worst, and most common of these; but the AD/CE edit war is another and clearer example. The wiki solution to the problem would be for anyone who was editing a sentence anyway to change the style if he objected to it, and otherwise to leave it alone. It is an elementary theorem of probability theory that the proportion of AD to CE would then reflect the proportion of people who prefer one to the other, and WP would achieve uniformity when the world does - and not before.
The same logic applies to the doubtless well-intentioned effort to format Wikipedia identically in every article, and to the recurring spats over Anglo-American usage. Both of these are also contrary to express policy, and I approve those policies.
[edit] Eventualism
Eventually Wikipedia will get it right. [3]
[edit] Delete, but don't Speedy
A few words quoted from Jimbo which have not gotten enough attention in all this:
- *g* Funny isn't it? I keep stumbling across pages ranting against my irrational vendetta and ban of userboxes when basically I'm just saying Everyone please relax a notch or two.--Jimbo Wales 02:35, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- There seems to be an understanding that you have given the OK for mass userbox deletion. I think it would be helpful if you could make it fully clear that this is not the case. Everyking 04:40, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- I don't know how I could be any more clear about it.--Jimbo Wales 14:53, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
-
I believe that divisive and inflammatory userboxes should be deleted. I am convinced by the events of the last few months that they should not be speedied. The reform proposal linked to a few sections above makes abundantly clear the amount of judgment involved in the application of T1; other speedy criteria can be verified trivially, and usually all reasonable editors will agree when they have been met.
TfD will also usually get rid of something faster, since speedies will often be listed on WP:UBD; and Undeletion will be seriously discussed and often approved. (Of course TfD's can be nominated for undeletion too; but if there has been visible consensus, the deletion reviewers will ignore it.) Septentrionalis 15:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles in need of attention
- Macedonia (region) (history|Talk|th)
- Alexander Hamilton (history|Talk|th)
- DPT (history|Talk|th)
- Coc (history|Talk|th)
- Carpetbagger (history|Talk|th)
- Chimera (history|Talk|th)
- R._J._Rummel (history|Talk|th)
- Phaistos_Disc (history|Talk|th)
- Perpetual peace (history|Talk|[th)
- Proto-Ionians (history|Talk|th)
- Greeks (history|Talk|th)
- others
[edit] Res agendae
- Update Menander from 1911
Create Tenedos and Imbros.- Proofread Offices in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
- Random mathematics article, thanks to User:Jitse Niesen
- Finley on Slavery in ancient Greece
- user:Pmanderson/notes
- User:Pmanderson/sandbox
[edit] Useful and amusing links
Spore - The Mooncow Glosses - Simon's RPG site - King Sheep - Smithson - Prairie Muffins - lenga - Serenity
Strong's - calculator - Mathscinet - Mathematical junkyard - primes - primetest - Elliptic primes
Lycos - Altavista - google - IP identification
NYT - The other WP - Grauniad - CSMonitor - Beeb
TNR - The Nation - Clay Bennett - Slate - Salon - Common Dreams - Prospect -
- Viruses
- Ld. Peter Soc,
- {JHWHC calendar
- art
- Sharktank
- Ren. poetry
- Met
- http://www.slashdot.org [nerds]
- http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html
- http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~dfox/porterlyrics.html
- http://www.cauce.org [anti-spam]
- http://www.casual-gamers.com/
- http://www.the-whiteboard.com/autowb541.html
- http://flag.blackened.net/ [anarchists]
- http://www.sozialistische-klassiker.org
- http://members.cox.net/dsleslie1/index.htm [Dana]
- http://theeternalgoldenbraid.blogspot.com/ {Fred Kiesche]
- http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Tom_Carman/
- http://www.6thinternational.org
[edit] Name
Okay, I forgot and put two ~s on each side of the name, instead of four in front. Antonio Giusti 08:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Antonio Giusti
[edit] Hi PM
I appreciate your efforts to keep New York Manumission Society NPOV. There is in fact a lot of reading on the web about these issues with the society. It's important to keep the coverage neutral.
I'm still wanting to add more "color" to the articles, i.e. specific activities of the group. I've got so much to do and little experience with Wikipedia, that I'm afraid I'm a bit intimidated and overwhelmed.
I know this is too much to ask, but I would really like to keep coverage of the Manumission society as positive and digestible as possible until March. Your edits so far are perfect, I just don't want there to be any edit wars or undue weight. I truly don't think you're the "bad guy" in your dealings with...others, in fact - I can see both sides. (Have you ever thought the user in question might be the source he most cites? Just a thought.)
I'm frankly hoping to enlist your help - if you can do anything at all to collaborate with me on this project (around all of these related articles), I would be so grateful.
- Sincerely,