Plan inclusive counterplan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Part of the series Policy Debate |
|
Organization | |
Policy debate competitions |
|
Format | |
Structure of policy debate · Resolution |
|
Participants | |
Affirmative · Negative · Judge |
|
Types of Arguments | |
Stock Issues · Case· Disadvantage |
|
Argumentative Concepts | |
In policy debate, a plan inclusive counterplan (or PIC) is a counterplan presented by the negative team which incorporates some of the affirmative's plan either functionally or textually. Most judges consider PICs theoretically legitimate although it is possible for the affirmative to defeat them on the grounds that they are illegitimate. Because they moot much of the 1AC offense, they are considered one of the deadliest negative strategies.
PICs include agent counterplans which propose to do the affirmative plan with a different agent, and exclusionary counterplans which exclude part of the affirmative plan. For example, if the affirmative plan was to "Pass the farm bill" a PIC would be to "Pass parts A and B of the farm bill". A well-worded PIC cannot be permed without severance because it is plan minus.