Talk:Pilgrims' Way

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


This article is within the scope of the Kent WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Kent in South East England.
If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.)
Mid This article is on a subject of mid-importance for Kent-related articles.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


Can we have a map (of the route)? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.111.128.3 (talkcontribs).

[edit] Ordnance Survey error

[edit] Wrong James?

According to an official history of the Ordnance Survey, the original source of the "enduring archaeological blunder" was General Sir Henry James, director from 1854 to 1875. (Owen, Tim; Pilbeam, Elaine (1992). Ordnance Survey. Southampton: Ordnance Survey, p 64. ISBN 0319004988. ) General Edward Renouard James (1833-1909) wasn't at work until about twenty years after the mistake (but he may have perpetuated it). --Old Moonraker 21:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What surveyor?

But I believe Edward Renouard James carried out the main survey work of Surrey in the 1860s. It seems likely he knew Albert Way, antiquary of Betchworth, who published a note on the Pilgrims' Way in Dean Stanley's 'Historical Memorials of Canterbury' in 1872. This got much more attention than James' pamphlet of the previous year. Crispinpaine 11:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)