User talk:Pielover87

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Note

Note: if this account has vandalised a page, it wasn't me! There's 2 people that use this computer, me and my brother. He likes to vandalise sometimes and I open a can of whoopass on him whenever he does. If there's a lot of vandalism coming from this account don't block it for too long please! pielover87 01:12, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

If that is the case you should probably log out before having him use the computer and make sure your browser does not save your password. richjkl 00:10, 25 December 2005 (UTC)


Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Umm, when did i do vandalism? This about peer review on uncle tom's cabin? I changed my mind about that and removed the tag right after i put it on the talk page.

Vandalizing user pages is not a good way to convince people that your article should not be deleted. This violates our agreement from earlier. Commit further vandalism and I will block you. android79 21:40, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:Android79, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu 03:28, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 255

I undid your move of 255 (number) to 255 article. You did two wrong things:

  1. You moved an article with copy and paste, instead of the "move" feature.
  2. You interchanged the number and the year article, that is against the conventions.

Please use more care. If you are in doubt about something, please ask first. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Counter Vandalism Unit

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 23:26, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] George W. Bush

I've blocked your account for 1 hour, so there can't be any more vandalism coming from your computer (as I see that there are good contributions from this account). However, you have to read the Blocking policy and see that your account could be deemed a "public account", which is blockable for long periods of time. I recommend that you change your password and to not select the "Remember me" option while logging in. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 00:14, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of in-text citations

This message is regarding the article North American Man/Boy Love Association. In-text citations serve an important purpose and should not be removed unless there is a consensus to do so. I consider this to be a type of vandalism, and it has been reverted. Please stop doing this, or you will, once again, be blocked from editing. Thank you. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 01:52, Dec. 31, 2005

Those citations were fucking the page up.

[edit] Ariel Sharon

This edit summary was inappropriate. Please refrain. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You're blocked for a week for your repeated anti-Semitic comments. When you come back, try to refrain from repeating them, or you'll be blocked indefinitely. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ditz von Shaunburg

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Ditz von Shaunburg, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. TheRingess (talk) 00:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/i/e/User_talk%7EPielover87_6e3f.html"