Talk:Phosphorescence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ]
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Yikes, this is a perfect page to explain the background of phosphorescence to a Physics PhD, but it happens that most people aren't.... can someone please explain what it is? Rob Hooft 16:26, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Can phosphorescence be considered a thermal phenomenon? lysdexia 10:26, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)


In a nutshell phosphorescence results in the delayed emission of light from a lumophore after photo-excitation. I tried to clean up the definition a little and separate out the blood and guts, but phosphorescence really is defined by the spin multiplicity of the excited species.
I do not think you can categorize phosphorescence as a strictly thermal phenomenon, though vibrational relaxation does dissipate energy as heat.
Fearofcarpet 21:34, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Explanation needed please

Could someone please either explain in layman's terms or omit

  • quantum mechanically forbidden
  • state singlet and state triplet
  • spin multiplicity
  • kinetically slow

Thanks! This introductory paragraph is very off-putting to non-experts as it stands. Lupin|talk|popups 01:37, 15 September 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Don't lose technical details

When addressing Lupin's suggestions, please do not lose the technical details that currently exist. Phosphorescence is a very specific type of luminescence, and as such should not simply restate that definition. It may be necessary to add a simplified introduction, or perhaps add some diagrams to indicate what is meant by singlet/triplet and dipole allowed/disallowed transitions. But as this is the heart of the physics, I strongly urge that it not be simply omitted.

crick22 19:00, 17 September 2005

[edit] Hmmm...

Yeah. I'm going to throw in the idea that perhaps this shouldn't be as much of a scientific article (though that can certainly be retained) as much as say... "It makes things freakin' glow. Cool." I mean, let's be honest. An encyclopaedia is supposed to be general. This isn't.

Are we just an encyclopedia, or better than an encyclopedia? I come here to learn stuff, I now have a bunch more pointers to things I otherwise would never have known existed. What in the hell is a triplet state? I dunno, but I can now find out - because someone said it was important. So I disagree with the loss of technical details. Yes, I would like some more laymen's stuff on this. But somethings *are* complex.
~ender 2006-05-24 09:33:MST
This article is not "better" than an encyclopedic article by many measures that I can think of. There are many reasons one would want to come to an article on this subject -- the current treatment should be restricted to a "how it works" section, with the larger article being about, say, the position of phosphorescence in culture and history, its replacement of radium paint, lists of materials, and its practical and decorative uses. I mean, for crying out loud, "Glow in the dark" redirects here. This article is like an ambush. It reminded me of the essay generator at (http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo). It's readable if you try, but even if you do so you will have learned nothing. --Kalthare 09:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Laymen's explanation added

I have added a paragraph attempting to provide a simpler explanation. However, the technical details given in the original version are excellent, and are truly helpful in defining the phenomenom clearly and unambiguously. - Xgu 22:38, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] List of materials?

The article mentions that there are numbers of different materials which have various slow time states, from larger than 10 nanoseconds, upwards to hours... I'd like to know what materials disperse stuff longest, and also, what types of output - is it completely linear degradation? Etc.
~ender 2006-05-24 9:36:MST

The degradation is normally roughly exponential. Occasionally multiple exponential decays can be observed depending on the rate determining step of the phosphoresent mechanism. 08/02/07

I'll second the idea for a list of materials. I came to this page because my 8 year old kid has some stuff in his bedrooom that glows when the lights are turned off. From sprinkling salt on the kitchen gas rings he knows sodium can create a yellow light and we see the same colour in sodium streetlights. I wanted to tell him that something else had a different colour and there is nothing on the phosphorescence page really helps.

Surely an idea of what phosphoresces is essential, even if the list is far from complete. Luckily the Wikipedia page for cats doesn't jump in at the deep end explaining their DNA!

Yes, please add a list of "glow in the dark materials"! Do they all contain Phosphor? Apus 12:00, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


A list of 'glow in the dark materials' is not relevant to this page because most glow in the dark materials do not glow because they are phosphorescent. Chemi-luminescence is a more common mechanism. Phosphor is a substance found inside television screens that can produce light when it is hit by a stream of electrons. It is not phosphorescent. An example of a phosphorescent material with particular relevance to current chemical research (possible future application in OLEDs) is iridium triphenylphosphine [Ir(ppy)3], and derivatives. These would 'glow in the dark', but the glow wouldn't be observable to the human eye because they have phosphorescent lifetimes in the order of microseconds (10-6 s) 08/02/07

[edit] Diagram?

It would be nice if someone could make a diagram showing the energy levels and transitions. -Scott, 9/19/06

comment: Add the jablonski diagram!

[edit] Disambiguation

Phosphorescence is comonly used to refer to the emission of light by bioluminescent plankton. This is not phosphorescence in the tecnical sense and is rightly not described in this article. I put in a disambiguation statement at the top of this page.

Are there other things which are commonly called phosphorescence which fall outside this article?

I suggest a separate article for "glow in the dark" which links briefly describes phosphorescence, chemoluminescence, bioluminescence, uv flourescence in the context of specific examples and has links to the technical articles.Threetwoone 01:17, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Explanation needed please: Spin orbit coupling

Can anyone explain why the presence of spin orbit coupling causes relaxation of the spin selection rules that render the event of phosphorescence unlikely? Thanks.

Removed dumb stuff, edited some other stuff and on the same note added what I thought was a bit more descriptive and accessible foreword to that chunk of hardcore quantum pyrotechnics. 124.243.128.11 04:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)