Talk:Philosophical analysis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Philosophy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy and the history of ideas. Please read the instructions and standards for writing and maintaining philosophy articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
[edit] Content change
I recently made some fairly drastic changes to this article. I added information on conceptual analysis, since it's so prominent in the method of analytic philosophy. I also then changed the direction and content of the article a bit. I hope it doesn't step on anyone's feet. The article was quite neglected and off topic. Thus, I removed the section about arguments--it was okay, it just wasn't really about analysis in philosophy. "Analysis" is not really a blanket term for the techniques used in philosophy. Rather, it's a term for the technique most prominently used in (analytic) philosophy. --Jaymay 21:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Expansion
I added some stuff recently, but it could still use expanding--especially the part on the controversy. This is a big topic in philosophy, especially right now. There's a lot to say and that's been said about it. --Jaymay 21:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
