Talk:Philip II of Macedon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
}}
Contents |
[edit] BC/BCE
This article was written using "BC". It was changed a few months ago by Neutrality to BCE. This is clearly in violation of policy, and I can think of no reason why it should continue to be reverted to BCE. john k 19:18, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Pederastic relationship with Pelopidas?
Any citations for this statement? Haiduc 23:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Prior to Kingship
Do we have any comment on what he's done prior to being king? I mean LOL!("read: I'm a doofus and use netspeak")
[edit] Skeletal remains
The article appears at odds with Science vol288 p511 "", 21 April 2000, which implies that the 1977 tomb did contain a skeleton, but it probably was not Philip II but Philip III. The abstract says "The Eye Injury of King Philip II and the Skeletal Evidence from the Royal Tomb II at Vergina Antonis Bartsiokas The Royal Tomb II was discovered in Vergina, Greece, in 1977. It contained a male skeleton and a rich array of grave goods. Evidence of trauma supposedly in the orbital bones of the skull has been thought to correspond to an eye injury that King Philip II is historically known to have suffered. However, reexamination of the orbital morphology showed no evidence of such pathology. Therefore, the skeleton does not belong to Philip II. New skeletal evidence shows that the skeleton belongs to King Philip III Arrhidaeus. In this case, the tomb may well contain some of the paraphernalia of Alexander the Great."
RockDoctor
There are about three scientific articles about the remains of his body. One in Archeologike Ephemeris 1981, a later one in the Journal of Hellenic Studies by Musgrave et ali. and in the American Journal of Archaeology later on. I'll look for the exact years later on. All are concerned with the remaining bone material from all parts of the skeleton. At least in the last article there was a reconstruction of his face presented. But this reconstruction uses portraits of Philipp. Overall a public relation gimmick imo. -Anon
__________________
I removed the following about skeletal remains as it appears at odds with journals and articles at present... "However, interestingly, no body or skeleton were ever found. All that remains of Philip II is ash, contained in a magnificent golden larnax, decorated with the Vergina sun, within his stone sarcophagus.[1]"
If you truly feel it ought to go back in, give a reason here on the talk page and reinsert it.
by the way: did you know funny jesters such as David Icke allege phillip to have been a reptilian humanoid? Foreigner 09:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Anyone want to add in the military reforms that Philip enacted in Macedonia?
is anybody talking i got a report to do and its hard can some1 help me out
Categories: B-Class Ancient Egypt articles | Unknown-importance Ancient Egypt articles | B-Class military history articles needing review | B-Class military history articles | B-Class biography articles | Greek articles | B-Class Greek articles needing review | B-Class Greek articles | High-importance Greek articles | Wikipedia featured articles in other languages (Finnish) | Wikipedia featured articles in other languages (German) | B-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles | Unknown-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles