Talk:Phil Dowd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

[edit] "Criticisms" Section?

I'm not entirely sure whether I get the point of the "criticisms" section. WP should be a forum of objective knowledge; and since (just about) every refereeing criticism has come from individuals partial to their clubs' benefits (players, managers, fans), I'm not entirely sure criticisms levelled by those individuals with vested interests should really be included on a WP entry for a referee. Otherwise every referee-related article would last for hundreds of pages!--Alexio 13:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

More to the point, it is told in a prosaic, non-NPOV style, based on hearsay, otherwise where are all the sources for the alleged "criticisms"? This could be one for the BLP, I think. Not acceptable. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 23:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I tried to clean this up a little. It seems rediculous to have such a long section unless this ref, who I don't know from adam, has an on the record verifiable problem or something. This reads like an angry fan who lost taking it out on the ref. Anyways --Tom 19:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I went back and looked at most of the other refs in this category and very few if any have such a section. I'm sure most refs have many critics and articles saying how bad they are. Anyways.--Tom 20:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I totally agree with your edits - perhaps I haven't been bold enough. But I WAS going to give the original contributors a chance to qualify what they 'reported' by asking for citations. We'll see if they come back and re-add the stuff.

By the way, Phil Dowd has reached the very top of the English refereeing tree quite late in his career, so late in fact that he retires next season, and he will never get the chance to go on the UEFA or FIFA list. He is also seen as very abrasive in his on-field style, and each time he upsets a group of fans, this page tends to get a pasting. So, no record of poor officiating, but question marks over his diplomatic skills during a game, certainly. Thanks. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 21:15, 16 February 2007 (UTC)