Talk:Phenomenon (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article upgrading needed: You can help. WP:IA 

 Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions

To contribute in upgrading this stub article to start class, the following requirements must be met:

  • Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.)
  • Film infobox ({{infobox film}})
  • Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image; non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible
  • Plot summary
  • Cast section
  • At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, references in popular culture, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.)
  • Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))

 Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF

Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to start class and this template will be removed automatically.

This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Unknown
This article has not been rated on the importance assessment scale.

[edit] Poor Plot Summary

I'm going to enlargen this plot significantly in the coming days. It's a shame that such a great film doesn't have a very thorough plot summary.
: Watemon 22:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Is the ending noted in the artcile the actual ending? I seem to remember it ending in the bar where everyone was celebrating George's birthday. Lochdale 19:25, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

I just watched the movie on HBO and you are correct. I'll see what I can do about changing it. --DalkaenT/C 15:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
I changed it, and while I was at it, removed the ridiculous HTML comment about how the editor would be adding "much much more" content and how any efforts by others to further edit the article would be reverted. That is quite simply against the spirit of Wikipedia. --DalkaenT/C 15:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)