User talk:Peterwats

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This page is currently protected due to death-threats from a banned user.
Please discuss changes on "request unprotection". Protection is not an endorsement of the current version. (protection log)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

{{User infobox | color = Red and yellow | Job = None | image = | image_caption = Workers of the worl unite for you have nothing to lose but your chains | name = Peter Watson |gender=Male |birthdate=April 11 |birthplace=Clayton, |marital status=Single |children=none :) |occupation=Student |religion=None |politics=New Commmuism |interests=Politics

  • Wikipedia
  • Computers/Internet
  • Karate
  • Feel free to add :)

Contents

Order of the Red Star

Order of the Red Star
I, Therat121, confer the Order of the Red Star upon Peterwats for his tireless contributions to fight against bias and nazi activists and posts. Thank you. therat121 23:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


Adminship

Peter, I have removed your nomination from the requests for adminship page, because it was malformed. I suggest you wait until you have a few months of contributions first. Kevin 09:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

And I did it the second time. Please don't keep adding yourself on. How about heading over to Wikipedia:Introduction instead to get familiar with some guidelines on contributing? Tijuana Brass¡Épa! 09:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ikiroid

Hi Peter. I moved your vote to the support section as I am guessing that was what you intended. Apologies if I have misunderstood your intention. --Guinnog 13:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)


Civility

Peter, you must remain civil in all your activity on Wikipedia, instead of writing things like this [1]. You also have to refrain from making personal attacks. I won't edit your heading above, but I strongly suggest that you do. Kevin 08:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

My RfA and your vote

Hi Peter,
Thanks for participating in my RFA! Ultimately, no consensus was reached, but I still appreciate the fact that you showed up to add in your two cents. You can feel free to talk to me about it or add some advice on my improvement page.


Sincerely, The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me)

You've got a Thank you card!

As they say in the movies, "oh be-have". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive).
Dave 16:06, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

North Warwick and South Warwick

You created both of these articles. Are they real places? --Fang Aili talk 16:25, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Talk:North Warwick, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dave 12:53, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
These have both now been deleted. You admitted that North Warwick was a fabrication, and I'm going to assume South Warwick was as well. I suggest that you never create hoax articles again if you hope to ever become an administrator, and indeed if you hope to not be banned altogether. Thank you. --Fang Aili talk 19:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


Signing your posts

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --Fang Aili talk 20:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: New Communism

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that New Communism meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Communism. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. --Zoz (t) 19:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Afd, spelling and such

Hey, Peterwats, I've just fixed your Australian Workers Party articles for deletion nomination. Next time if you want to nominate an article for deletion, you should follow the 3 easy steps, otherwise noone will notice your intention. Also, please try to check your spelling, it's very important for the syntax. Also, try to use the preview feature. Thanks. --Zoz (t) 22:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Teenage Mutant Leela's Hurdles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

NPA

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -Will Beback · · 18:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Calling your fellow editors "commies" is not helpful. Please be more respectful. -Will Beback · · 07:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you deliberately introduce incorrect information into a page, as you did to List of dictators, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Psychonaut 12:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Improper use of speedy deletion

Please do not nominate articles for speedy deletion which do not meet Wikipedia's Criteria for Speedy Deletion, as you did with Fight Dem Back [2]. If you continue such activity you will be blocked. —Psychonaut 12:09, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


AfD Nomination: Communist Party of Warwick

I've nominated the article Communist Party of Warwick for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Communist Party of Warwick satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communist Party of Warwick. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Communist Party of Warwick during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. —Psychonaut 12:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Do not repost deleted pages

You have recently re-created the article Talk:Australian Worker's Party, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. —Psychonaut 12:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Adding non-notable material to Wikipedia

Please stop adding non-notable material to Wikipedia, as you did at Peter Watson (political activist). You have been repeatedly warned about this and could be indefinitely blocked for this behaviour. —Psychonaut 10:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely.
Martinp23 10:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)