User talk:PeterNisbet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello PeterNisbet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- KHM03 05:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lugger

Thank you for drawing my attention to the St Abbs site. I like it. I wish I could say I had done something similar in my part of the world. If it's your site, congratulations! Any tips about software, pitfalls and the like would be welcome. :)

About your question: taking the columns as lettered and the rows as numbered, the best seems to be E 11. It includes the whole rig and the figures give a good idea of the size of the vessel and its sails.
C 9 would make a second best choice.
B 7 would be useful if you were looking not at the rig, as is relevant here but at the lines of the hull.
(RJP 13:21, 27 February 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Fifie

Hello Peter, I discovered your nice article yesterday when I was creating Scottish Fisheries Museum. I see that the images you added come from the St Abbs community website. From the discussion above it seems that you are the site creator, and if so well done, it's a very nicely done and informative site. Just for your information the link you had in the St. Abbs article just leads to what looks like an old maintenance notification, so you may wish to fix that on the community site page. I've also fixed the article meantime.

My main reason for contacting you is that the copyright tags you have on the 3 images are a bit ambiguous, and they run the risk of being flagged up for deletion. Image copyright is one of the "big issues" on WP right now, and it would be a shame to see these falling foul of the many bots and users running round identifying incorrectly tagged images. If the drawing of the Fifie was created by you, it might be best to release it under one of the acceptable free licences rather that "copyright, no rights reserved". The postcard images are also tagged as "copyrighted free use" which seems to be doubtful. If the postcards were published before 1923, which looks likely, then they are almost certainly Public Domain in the US, which would make them bombproof as far as deletion goes. Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Image copyright tags are very helpful for treading through the copyright minefield.

Let me know if I can help out in any way. Cheers. --Cactus.man 10:01, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Eyemouthharbour.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eyemouthharbour.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)