User:Petros471/RfA reviews/CTSWyneken

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
  • Edit count - Currently 4884, mostly article and article talk. Wikipedia:148, WP talk:50, usertalk 1111.
  • Time around - First edit 20 June 2003
  • Email enabled? - yes
  • Controversial userpage? - only if people dislike public declaration of possible POV (not a problem for me as long as it doesn't enter articles)
  • Any blocks? - no
  • Stupid signature? - no
  • Edit summaries - Mathbot "99% for major edits and 74% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 143 minor edits in the article namespace." Mostly used, bit low in places.
  • Civil? No person attacks? - (check after full namespace review)
  • Mistakes - (ditto)
  • Any edit warring? - (ditto)

Main oppose reasons from last RFA:

  • Low project space edits:
  • Oppose by SlimVirgin, bias on Martin Luther, will need to take a look at this.
  • Slight concern over low edit summary usage
  • Narrow range of edits
  • Not fully familiar with admin processes (e.g. blocking)
  • "wolf in sheep's clothing" accusation/POV pushing
  • General feeling of not being able to trust that admin tools won't be used to help in content disputes.
  • Answers to questions - first couple are rather on the short side, not sure ignoring Doright on an RFA is best option- but not sure on this as I don't know the history of this editor.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/e/t/User%7EPetros471_RfA_reviews_CTSWyneken_8a0c.html"