User:Peter G Werner/Harry's Place (saved)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Harry's Place is a British political weblog that is a major voice of what it calls "the pro-liberation left" (a group more disparagingly referred to as "liberal hawks"). It was first set up in November 2002 and named for the Sham 69 song "Hurry up Harry" and the first name of the founder of the blog, Harry Hatchet. The logo on the front page of the blog is a quote from George Orwell: "Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear".
Harry's Place gets an average daily traffic of over 100,000 visits.[1] It was nominated for a Guardian award for political blogs [2] and also nominated in the 2005 Weblog awards for UK blogs.[3]
Contents |
[edit] Politics
The political stance of Harry's Place is centre-left and supportive of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the concept of humanitarian intervention, and liberal dissident movements in the Islamic world. It is a supporter of a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine, and is a defender of Israel's right to exist within safe and secure boundaries. It is highly critical of Islamism [4] and of allegedly totalitarian, pro-Islamist, and anti-Semitic tendencies on the left.[5] [6] Nick Cohen noted that the blog was one of few places where it was being pointed out that "a section of the left has allied with religious fundamentalism". [7]
The site is particularly critical of Ken Livingstone, [8] [9] George Galloway, [10] RESPECT, [11] [12] and the Socialist Workers Party (Britain).[13] It is a staunch opponent of religious and political censorship of all kinds, [14] and was a sponsor of the 2006 London March for Free Expression.[15] The site is also one of the main backers of the Euston Manifesto.[16]
Harry's Place has a love-hate relationship with The Guardian. Harry has noted that he is still a Guardian reader [17] and he has had several guest columns in The Guardian's technology and online commentary sections.[18] [19] On the other hand, Harry's Place contributors disagree with The Guardian's editorial writers more often than not, and their vehement disagreements with various Guardian columns are a frequent subject of topic on their site.[20] Harry's Place is a frequent subject of satire in The Guardian's pseudonymous "Norman Johnson" column.[21] In April 2006, Harry's Place has mirrored its site under the domain name Grauniad.org, an allusion to The Guardian's reputation for frequent typos and misspellings.
[edit] Contributors
Harry's Place was originally started by Harry Hatchet (aka "Harry" - none of Harry's Place writers use their full name), who was originally the sole writer. Harry was active in British anti-fascist and Marxist politics in the late 1970s, but was largely inactive after that. The September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center served as a "wake up call" according to Harry, prompting him to try and better understand what political forces led up to it. In 2002, he began blogging as a way to clarify his own thoughts on political issues such as the impending war in Iraq.[17] The rapid growth in the site's audience led him to include other like-minded writers so that the blog could be updated more regularly. Harry ceased to contribute regularly at the end of September 2005.[22] [21]
Other contributors include Marcus, Gene Zitver (aka "Gene"), and David T. Marcus is an old friend and political comrade of Harry's. Marcus attended the February 15, 2003 anti-war protest in London, and came away with the opinion that "I don't know if I can consider myself left-wing anymore if this is the left". Marcus wrote about his views on the politics behind the February 15th demonstration, and soon became a regular contributor.[17] Gene is a resident of the United States and from a socialist and trade union background, and had spent several years living in Israel. Harry came across Gene's posts on a George Orwell discussion list, and invited him to start posting on his blog.[17] David T is a lawyer and former lecturer. David T also came to blogging after the September 11th attacks. One of his close childhood friends was among those killed in the World Trade Center, while another close childhood friend became a militant Islamist, and appeared in the media applauding the attacks. He took up reading and writing blogs as a way of trying to making sense of these events.[23] Journalist Johann Hari also contributed articles to the weblog until Autumn 2004, when he left to start his own blog.
[edit] Controversy
The comments pages on Harry's Place are an open forum, and there are many who visit the site simply to post and make their disagreement known. The level of debate can become quite heated and it has been alleged that in spite of Harry's Place' oft-stated opposition to censorship, they are not above blocking users or removing their posts if the argument becomes heated enough.[24]
Like many critics of Islamism, Harry's Place is often accused of Islamophobia.[25] The site's contributors reply that they are criticizing what they see as a reactionary interpretation of Islam, not Muslims in general, and that they are expressing solidarity with Muslims who are oppressed by Islamists.[26] [27] Critics of the site take issue with the contributors identification of their politics as "Left", holding that their support for the war in Iraq and their ostensible Islamophobia precludes them from being left-wing in any sense. Critics also contend that Harry's Place and the "pro-war left" does not represent a political movement of any significance, but is simply the voice of a relatively few individuals amplified through the blogosphere.
[edit] Readership
Nick Cohen described Harry's Place as "the meeting place of the antifascist left".[28] The blog was mentioned as one of his favourite websites by Peter Tatchell[29] and has been cited in the press by Janet Street-Porter.[30] Henry McDonald of The Observer described "the sane left, robustly secular, anti-fundamentalist website" as "my newly found spiritual home". [31]
[edit] References
- ^ See traffic details.
- ^ The Guardian political blog awards
- ^ Weblog awards
- ^ Islamism and Democracy (August 31, 2005)
- ^ The alliance (July 27, 2005)
- ^ Left antisemitism (October 23, 2005)
- ^ Nick Cohen, "Saddam's very own party", The New Statesman, June 7, 2004, p. 26
- ^ Playing softball with Ken Livingstone (July 20, 2005)
- ^ Ken Livingstone hosts Muslim Brotherhood propaganda exercise (February 8, 2006)
- ^ My sendoff for George (September 25, 2005)
- ^ RESPECT and the missing 500,000 (December 1, 2005)
- ^ Pensioner attacked by RESPECT supporter (April 28, 2005)
- ^ More Atzmon weasel words from the SWP (June 22, 2005)
- ^ Kill the Bill (October 27, 2005)
- ^ Freedom of Expression (March 27, 2006)
- ^ The Manifesto - a personal view (April 13, 2006)
- ^ a b c d Little Atoms interview with Harry September 16, 2005. (Links to MP3.)
- ^ Harry Hatchet, "A Blogger Writes", The Guardian, July 15, 2003
- ^ Comment is Free
- ^ Bunting cant (March 29, 2006)
- ^ a b Norman Johnson, "Free Radical: Don't pretend Harry's exit is just coincidence", The Guardian, October 8, 2005, p. 9
- ^ Media Matters, The Observer, October 2, 2005, p. 9
- ^ Oliver Burkeman, "The new commentariat", The Guardian, November 17, 2005, p. 8
- ^ Bloggerheads, June 2006
- ^ Bob Pitt, Harry's Place and Islamophobia Watch, Islamophobia Watch, March 24, 2005
- ^ On Islamophobia (January 19, 2005)
- ^ Islamophobia Watch (March 23, 2005)
- ^ Nick Cohen, "Cool logic our only weapon against the preachers of hate", Evening Standard, August 9, 2005, p. 15
- ^ "I am... Peter Tatchell", The Independent, January 31, 2006, p. 11
- ^ Janet Street-Porter, "Spare us these monuments to vanity", The Independent, December 23, 2004, p. 29
- ^ Henry McDonald, "In defence of bigotry: the Religious Hatred Bill will only feed prejudice and lawyers", The Observer, June 12, 2005, p. 27
[edit] External links
[Category:Political weblogs] [Category:Politics of the United Kingdom]