Talk:Peter Woit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

	Physics Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ]
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.
Help with this template Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Updated and expanded the brief Peter Woit entry using public domain information, on the basis that his moderated weblog, 'Not Even Wrong', is now drawing a great deal of attention from leading string theorists and their critics.

[edit] Is Peter Woit self-promoting? (apparently not)

A large number of anonymous edits both here and at not even wrong appear to be emanating from an AOL account. (AOL addresses start with 172.188 and similar numbers). I just removed a huge amount of linkspam and Peter-Woit-promotion from there. zowie 00:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

I just got an e-mail from Peter. He says it's not him. zowie 14:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Can you not delete links without discussion here first?

Zowie and others, stop editing Wiki if you don't know the rules. You should discuss proposed changes here before deleting content, or it is VANDALISM. The links you have removed are to newspaper articles, and it is a feature of Wikipedia that information can be added of this sort.

You aren't doing any service by removing information.

Peter Woit does not do a good job of keeping a concise list of relevant information and links abailable to the media coverage of the problems in string theory, so this is not a duplicate. You have destroyed the work over the last year of keeping an up to date list of relevant references. 172.189.165.249 15:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Copy of question to Zowie being placed on personal page, so that there is some chance he might see it and read it:

Hi - I notice you say you have removed all the links to not even wrong newspaper articles I placed as they appeared over several months? The AOL account is England. Can I ask why you vandalised the article? (I'm anon because I get more abuse from string theorists and their defenders if I disclose my name - for example the abuse you would probably dish out seeing that you've deleted links to information for a bogus reason of "self-promotion????".) It is an information resource on the work being done to expose the bogus self-promotion by the community of string theorists which results in alternatives such as my work, being prevented from being allowed updates on the CERN Document Server and other places which are now controlled by arxiv. (Cern ext section has closed and the docs there can't be updated; cern only accepts ext docs via arxiv which censors scientific work without it being read or checked, in preference to string theory/mainstream speculation.) 172.189.165.249 15:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

(For what it's worth, I responded to this on my personal talk page 'way back in June...) zowie 19:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)