Talk:Peter III of Aragon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility work group. | ||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Spain which aims to to expand and organise information better in articles related to the history, languages, and cultures of Spain. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Sicily, an attempt to build a comprehensive collection of articles on the history, geography, culture and political structures of Sicily, and related biographies on Sicilians. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article or visit the project page, where you can join the project and choose from a list of open tasks. |
[edit] Source
See http://libro.uca.edu/chaytor/hac7.htm. Srnec 18:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Needing verification?
What exactly does this mean. Everything in the article seems fairly uncontroversial and, to my eye, looks to be correct. I understand that there are no citations, but it seems to me a bad idea to put a "this article is probably wrong" notice on every article that doesn't have citations. Is that wikipedia policy now? john k 13:48, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with you. For what its worth, I have added a reference to Runciman which includes some of these facts. ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 15:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Shall we remove the notice, then? I mean, I'm not opposed to making sure that more articles cite sources. But we shouldn't have this kind of blanket policy of just inserting disclaimers randomly into any article that isn't sourced. Any article without citations needs citations. But there's a ton of articles without citations. We should only add specific disclaimers if we think the article is actually wrong. john k 23:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hi John - I did remove it. ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 01:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Shall we remove the notice, then? I mean, I'm not opposed to making sure that more articles cite sources. But we shouldn't have this kind of blanket policy of just inserting disclaimers randomly into any article that isn't sourced. Any article without citations needs citations. But there's a ton of articles without citations. We should only add specific disclaimers if we think the article is actually wrong. john k 23:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Re this line "He conquered Sicily and became its king in 1282" - it is sort of correct. He became King after the Sicilian Vespers, but he was actually invited in by the Sicilian barons to become King and assist in the defence of Sicily from the inevitable attempt to reconquer the island by Charles of Anjou. So is the line as it currently stands completely accurate? πίππύ δ'Ω∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 08:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] CATALAN Monarchs?
I see that wikipedia is having a tough time fighting the expansionist aspirations of some ethnicities. Crown of Aragon, Aragonese monarch.
Eboracum 09:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
