User talk:Perrymason

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "i should have been unblocked by now"


Decline reason: "Your block log states that your block is indefinite. --  Netsnipe  ►  01:48, 9 February 2007 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

yes i know but i dont think it should be. thats why i am asking for it to be changed. - Perrymason

On what grounds? The threats of violence you made were quite significant and are absolutely not tolerated on Wikipedia. How can we be sure you will not repeat them should we unblock you? --  Netsnipe  ►  02:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
formally i made small edits and was trying to be a little helpful but then 1 admin kept attacking and provoking me and when i responded rudely (which i admit was incorrect) they shut me down, which meant they broke an admin rule:

"Blocking to gain an advantage in a content dispute is strictly prohibited. Sysops must not block editors with whom they are currently engaged in a content dispute."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#When_blocking_may_not_be_used

im not trying to badmouth this admin too much but if you look at their history they have acted in this way a few times, i however have not. i am quite happy to stay away from that admin if they dont bring attitude my way. i will just continue to make small edits and try to help out. Perrymason 00:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)