User talk:Perique des Palottes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Image license
Hi. What is the license of Image:Shetland.png (and other similar maps)? If they are public domain or GFDL could you please add the source and either {{PD}} or {{GFDL}}. Thanks, Maximus Rex 13:43, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
That image is 'public domain' by me -- Perique des Palottes 2005/02/17
[edit] Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
[edit] Image:Orkney.png
Greetings. I have listed Image:Orkney.png on Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion because it has no source or licensing information, and it's not listed in any articles. If you would like this image to be kept, please add source and licensing information, and include it in an article. If you need any help with this, just ask me. Thanks! – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 23:41, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Orkney.png
| Image deletion warning | The image Image:Orkney.png has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information. |
-- Paddu 00:02, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
That image is 'public domain' by me -- Perique des Palottes 2005/08/03
- Oh! The deletion could have been avoided had you noted the source and licensing info. while uploading the image itself. Can you re-upload the image with proper source andl licensing info., e.g. {{PD-self}}. Thanks! -- Paddu 19:31, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- Sorry for the confusion. Looks like the image wasn't deleted due to unclear copyright status. It has been modified a bit and re-uploaded as Image:Orkney Islands.PNG. -- Paddu 14:43, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
