User talk:Perfectblue97
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Old Conversations
[edit] Award from Dynamo_ace
Keep up the good work!-Dynamo_ace Talk
[edit] Award from Jumping cheese
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
I hereby award Perfectblue97 the Tireless Contributor Barnstar for all the hard work in expanding the Kim Possible pages. Keep it up! Jumping cheese Cont@ct 06:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Personal question
I hope you don't mind, but I noticed your userboxes that say you speak Chinese and that you're homesick, I was just wondering if you were living in the United States and what your background was? I was going to email you privately, but I don't think you have email enabled - you can write me at <removed email address> if you like! Dreadlocke ☥ 02:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for protecting my email address. Actually, there's no personal information in it, I created it specially for use on Wikipedia. Many editors do that so they can email without sending any personal information or identifiers. I wouldn't put my own personal email address in either, so I understand where you're coming from. Thanks for the excellent answer, I get it! You can delete this whole section if you like. I'm happy to be editing with you, you are a very fine editor. Dreadlocke ☥ 18:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- I love the Chinatown where I used to live. I lived in NYC for fifteen years (Manhattan). When my brother was visiting me, he and I would always make a pilgrimage to his favorite restaurant, Wo-hop on Mott Street, the best hot & sour soup in town! I miss New York; Florida is quite a different culture! (This stuff is ok to leave, I've already identified myself as a Floridian with user boxes!) I lived in California for a while too, the Chinatown there was magnificent - well, it was many moons ago when I was there. I'm getting old...;) Dreadlocke ☥ 22:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bonnie pictures
I think the more pictures, the better. How does that picture not add to the text? Don't just think you can do whatever the hell you want without explaining, PB97. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by =CJK= (talk • contribs) 02:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] email
Perfectblue, it would be convienient if you were to create a special email account which you would be willing to share with Wikipedia users.
What is the status of EVP within parapsychology? Martinphi (Talk Ψ Contribs) 21:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] EVP
Suggestion: let them work. Then later, we get together and sandbox it, and revise it to something NPOV. Martinphi (Talk Ψ Contribs) 01:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Exactly- especially the part about getting more people together. I know little about the topic, my interest is purely NPOV. Martinphi (Talk Ψ Contribs) 19:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Opinion?
You might want to take a look here: [1]
[edit] RfC
I know you've worked a lot with Martin, thought you might like to know about this; Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Martinphi. Dreadlocke ☥ 17:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Comments
I don't know if you're watching the RfC page, but this was directed at you. I guess he was just trying to say that since you didn't comment on some of the actual charges that you weren't directly involved with, that you apparently had nothing good to say. It's an "outside view", so you can comment on any of it, even if you weren't directly involved in the incident. Dreadlocke ☥ 22:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- I hope I defended you correctly from the attack by Simões. I just couldn't stand by and see that go unremarked on. You're right, it was an ad-hominem attack from him that could only be meant to try and discredit you. Terrible. Dreadlocke ☥ 18:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I changed the heading structure of these sections [2] because they appear to be separate subject. If I'm wrong, please revert or tell me to do it...Thanks! Dreadlocke ☥ 00:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RFC
I have endorsed your opinion on the Martin RFC. And I think it's unconscionable for these skeptics trying to harass established editors who oppose them. WooyiTalk, Editor review 03:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Apology
I'd like to apologize for the parenthetical insinuation of your motives I made on the RFC discussion. It added nothing to my post and was entirely uncalled for. Simões (talk/contribs) 14:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)