Talk:Percy Henn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] GA nom
This one isn't quite up to GA standards yet, see my peer review for reasoning.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 16:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- I don't know who assessed this but there is no way it is up to B-class, more like start.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 01:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Reverted pending discussion. My understanding is that Henn is a fairly obscure figure for which little information is available. Thus, even though the article is short, everything seems to have been covered, and there are no key elements missing. I should think it would prove useful to the majority to people visiting in search of information on Henn. Hence B would seem most appropriate per Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment#Quality scale. Hesperian 02:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, I see.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 08:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know who assessed this but there is no way it is up to B-class, more like start.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 01:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] legacy
There's a Henn close in Winthrop, Western Australia since winthrop is associated with UWA I wonder whether HEnn close is named after Percy Henn. The question is where to find such information to provide a cite for its inclusion in the article. Gnangarra 08:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- I guess there would be a source in the UWA library... Seventy dot 03:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA
Feel free to resubmit it if you think it qualifies. I don't review the same articles twice, see what someone else thinks.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 11:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Though I must say the concerns I noted were more the enough reason to fail it, GA criteria 1 is "well written" and GA criteria 4 is NPOV, both of which were concerns I noted on my peer review. I would definitely address those if I were the one resubmitting it, just my two cents.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 11:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Those weasel words was all I noted...anyway, on that, mostly the prose was my concern, I have made a couple additional notes on the peer review. Like I said I won't be the one reviewing it next time (because I thnk articles get better and better the more eyes that look at them) but I am willing to point out anything I notice, I won't mess with geographic locales, promise, I'll just mention if something is confusing here or on the review page. : )A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 11:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA Resubmission
I am relisting the article for GA review. Auroranorth (WikiDesk) 11:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New contributor
Just to let everyone know, I'm here to take over from Auroranorth as Wikipedia's resident Guildford Grammar School student. I've been editing for a while on my (ever-changing) IP address, and I decided to go all the way because Auroranorth got blocked. I'll see you in the future! Seventy dot 04:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- I refactored the above to remove the personal attack / schadenfreude. Hesperian 05:09, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Version 0.7
This article falls outside the scope of this next release. However, it will be automatically considered for later, larger releases. Walkerma 04:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)