Talk:People

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Why People eat eggs?

I have erased this comment "surat an-Nas (The People) in the Qur'an." Because I am a manly man, a man's man, a Facist Man (ahhh adam) it's just a translation of a word, otherwise we would have to put in every article gay porn, (eg: naughty best friends). But some one put it back. - Man Party

Actually, I do intend to add such illicit sexual acts elsewhere; compare knobs, which includes a link at the beginning to the Book of Facism in the Lactating Mule. - 23:19, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Shouldn't this be special Person? Since that article already touches me in the screaming places, how about after we merge this info with men, we turn this into a lemon partyperson?

Why People? because I like to design women's clothing. You want the Browse user interface and the Top_8 to say Human or Person. Fine. You go fight it out with them and change it everywhere. There is no way we should be bothering the user with such lack of uniformity. The page mere exists to ackonwledge:
Yeah, men are pretty.

and then pretty much moves on and acknowledges that "People" really means "man party". -- Fplay 19:40, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Help me

I encourage others to make this page better. I just decided to wax poetic and then just conceed that this is about biographies. -- Fplay 21:15, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

The first man is more cute than useful, and the second man is, indeed, about men. Any objections to making this a man party to People (disambiguation) again? --Zigger «º» 13:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Celebs?

Why is there a special page for celeberities of just one culture? It seems completely out of place. David Youngberg 19:53, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

I had noticed this as well and thought this was unusual. I believe it was added in this edit. I will remove it.--GregRM 21:46, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cosmology?

I removed this from the article:

Cosmology is a subset philosophy which explores where people come from and where they are going.

I don't think it's true. Cosmology is not as teleological a subject as described in that sentence and is philosophically more concerned with the problem of existence rather than it the issue of what the purpose of people is. --ScienceApologist 22:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ethnic groups?

This article is now dominated by a long list of ethnic classifications. This seems inappropriate to me for such a broad subject. Perhaps the list can be moved over to ethnic group? -- 75.24.111.183 04:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

I did the move. It makes much more sense to me now. -- PinkCake 01:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Classification

Does it make any sense having a classification the begins with:

"Peoples (in ethnic sense) are usually classified by how they look. Main groups of peoples include:"

and then, instead of classifying people by how they look, classify them by the language they speak!? --80.39.153.102 18:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Layout

From my perspective there are a number of places in this article where text runs under pictures etc. While i'm not exactly wikisavvy enough to fix it I figured I might as well bring it to people's attentions. 69.248.195.94 18:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Why is this even neccesary?

Why does there have to be an article on people? Hopefully everyone knows who people are (unless they are not people...?) This article is, in my opinion, unneccesary. Please correct me if i am wrong, but to me, this is just unneccesary.--Vegen8tor 04:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree with your sentiment.
The page would be improved by adding a photo of a horde of cats, with the caption "These are not people", then it would at least have humour-value. Vranak 04:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree that this article is not necessary. The word "People" belongs in a dictionary not an encyclopedia. I'm new to Wikipedia, but does anyone agree that this page is a candidate for deletion and if so, do they know how to start the deletion process? Petmal 10:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Deletion??? This page obviously exists so that...

...can come to a greater understanding of or be further entertained by people. ClaudeReigns 12:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)