User talk:Peakdetector
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
Hello, Peakdetector, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- moe.RON talk | done | doing 00:23, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Tea Leaf Green
Your recent edit to Tea Leaf Green (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 22:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Justin Kreutzmann
While I appreciate your enthusiasm for Wikipedia, there are steps to be taken before deleting a page. I have reinstated the material at this page and have place a template:prod on the page. For more of the deletion process, see Wikipedia:Deletion Policy. Cheers! -- moe.RON talk | done | doing 00:23, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- moe.RON talk | done | doing 01:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- moe.RON talk | done | doing 02:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edits to Deadspin
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Deadspin. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have a problem with the content of the article, please make productive edits or WP:AFD. Vandalizing the article will just get your edits reverted.
- With regards to your comments on Talk:Deadspin: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Ytny 05:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Article for deletion
Hey, you put Afd tags on Deadspin and Will Leitch, but you haven't finished the process. You're not even halfway through! You have to now click on the red link and begin the discussion - for more on how to go about nominating an article for deletion, read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion. And it would be helpful to look at other deletion discussions and learn the style and etiquette.
At this point, I would advise you to retract the Afd bids. Not because I like Deadspin or Leitch, but because you don't stand a chance, and they look like bad faith Afd bids. Both Deadspin and Will Leitch comfortably meet guidelines set in WP:WEB and WP:Bio, respectively. They both require significant cleanup, but their notability aren't up for debate.
Good luck! Ytny 06:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
-Not sure what your grudge is against Gawker Media and related figures. Articles could use cleanup but deletion is overkill. Barryap 22:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- hey dee STOP STOP NOW!!!! Brent schneider 18:39 31 january 2007
- I agree with Barryap. Affirmed 01:24, 1 February 2007 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.135.17.34 (talk • contribs).
[edit] Do Not Vandalize Wikipedia
Do not introduce articles for deletion in bad faith.
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Nick Denton, you will be blocked. --Dennisthe2 02:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Deadspin
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Deadspin, you will be blocked. Ytny (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Deadspin, you will be blocked. Zzz345zzZ 16:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)