Talk:Paul Gourley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

Contents 1 VFD 2 April 2006 3 November 2006 4 January 2007 5 This is an article talk page, please respect the other editors!

[edit] VFD

Please note that this article was once deleted as the result of a vote for deletion. See details here. In this VFD I voted delete, however I do not feel strongly enough to nominate this page for another round of deletion votings. Oliver Keenan 15:15, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 2006

I think someone should talk about the shady upcomings up Gourley and how he bought votes to win. As a delegate who actually voted for Gourley, I certainly see it as a mistake. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.102.159.252 (talk) 22 April, 2006.

[edit] November 2006

This article seems to be an exercise in sheer vanity. It should be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eshatologist (talk • contribs). 19 November, 2006.

[edit] January 2007

Rather than deleting it, it should be revised to talk about the controversy surrounding Gourley. Maybe someone should mention that the College Republicans on facebook.com have started a group stating that they would rather have Stewie Griffen as chairman. rlee1185 05:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Edited all the opinion, analysis, and editorializing out of the article. Previous iterations of article was taken verbatim from CRNC website. Guest 10:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.242.94.33 (talk)

[edit] This is an article talk page, please respect the other editors!

I restored the two comments above that were deleted by 69.242.94.33. Removing others' comments is technically referred to as 'Talk Page Vandalism' (see WP:VANDAL). Everyone, please sign your comments! New editors that prefer not to log in may find that their work is not taken as seriously as it deserves. The new editor has done nothing but edit this one article, so he has no track record of work elsewhere on Wikipedia. I added new headings to clarify when all the comments were added.EdJohnston 04:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC)