Paul McHugh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Paul McHugh (b. 1958) is a New Zealand academic lawyer. He was born in Gisborne. He teaches at the University of Cambridge where he is a Reader in Law and Fellow of Sidney Sussex College (from 1984).

He graduated LL.B. (Hons), first class, from Victoria University of Wellington 1979, LLM (Saskatchewan) 1980, and PhD Cambridge (dissertation "The aboriginal rights of the New Zealand Maori at common law", awarded a Yorke Prize 1988).

He is the Visiting Ashley McHugh Ngai Tahu Professor at Victoria University of Wellington (2004-8).

[edit] Work in the field of law

Paul McHugh's work has primarily been in the field of common-law aboriginal rights, a topic on which he has published extensively. His pioneering work on the doctrine of aboriginal title in New Zealand argued (1984) that there remained unextinguished Maori rights around the coastline. The High Court accepted and cited his work in the Te Weehi case (1986). This case spawned a series of cases in which New Zealand courts applied Maori customary law recognising it as the basis for Maori rights and exemption from the regulatory regime of the Fisheries Act 1988.

The Crown did not appeal this case, some believed because of anxieties about the 'activist' Court of Appeal, where Sir Robin Cooke was President and which was then giving judgment in the Maori Council series of cases. Those cases, like Te Weehi extended the scope and justiciablity of Maori rights considerably, and raised charges of judicial legislation.

Residual common-law rights formed an important background to the the Maori sea fisheries settlement (1992) and the Court of Appeal's controversial judgment in the foreshore and seabed case (2003). McHugh published The Maori Magna Carta[[]] in 1991, which for the first time explained and analysed the range of laws specifically affecting Maori in the light of the Treaty of Waitangi.

In the 1990s his work began incorporating a comparativist dimension, culminating in the publication (2004) of Aboriginal societies and the common law: a history of sovereignty, status and self-determination (“magisterial in its comprehensiveness and depth of analysis” Indigenous Law Journal (2005 4, 241-51)). The book picks up themes of his work in the previous decade, particularly the intellectual influence of John Pocock (Johns Hopkins) and R. A. Sharp (Auckland, writer of "Justice and the Maori" (1990 and 1997)). In particular McHugh argues for the historicisation not just of legal doctrine, but of the notion of law itself; so that the history of the common law's encounter with tribal societies becomes also an expression of the change in the nature and modalities of legal thought. Further, the first half of the book considers the notion of sovereignty and how it developed in the Crown's dealings with non-Christian and tribal peoples from the medieval period. The second half of the book considers the modern history of aboriginal rights, once they had been admitted into what he calls the 'common-law rights-place' as a result of key court judgments. All common-law jurisdictions (Canada in 1973; the United States in 1978; New Zealand in 1986-91) and Australia (1992 and 1996) experienced the impact of major court judgments dramatically reconfiguring state relations with the tribes. Thrust into the rights-place aboriginal peoples have had to develop the legalism of life inside that habitat. This has presented issues of what McHugh terms 'rights-management' (governance) and '-integration'.

In a series of papers from 1995, McHugh began considering the historiographical properties of legal thought and method and legal process; with Andrew Sharp initiating a debate in New Zealand and Australia that has been continued by other academics and writers such as John Pocock (reproduced ih his collection of essays "The discovery of islands" (2005), WH Oliver, Bain Attwood and Giselle Byrnes. The essay collection "Histories Power and Loss" brings this work together, anchored by Pocock's essay.

McHugh has also considered the constitutional basis of Crown relations with Maori outside of a claims-centred mode of engagement, a commissioned paper for the NZ Department of Justice published with another, on a similar theme by Ken Coates as “Aboriginal Identity and Relations in North America and Australasia” (Two major essays, edited by P Sarr and accompanied by short commentaries in Kokiri Ngatahi: Living Relationships - The Treaty of Waitangi in the New Millenium (Wellington: Victoria University Press, 1998) at 107-186.). This paper, with its argument for the recognition of Crown and tribe in ongoing relations from which exit is not possible and finality and closure illusory, influenced the move towards more 'relational' approaches in the public sphere where Maori issues were to be seen in terms of living relationships rather than a sequence of problems to be eliminated. The language of closure and exit that dominated Pakeha (European) discourse of Maori claims was predicated upon an outcome - Maori mergence into a culturally undifferentiated populace - that would never happen and which, in any event, was contrary to the Treaty itself (and, he might have added, the plain demographic pattern which strengthens rather than diminishes Polynesian profile) .

He has also written of the nature of constitutional memory and its manifestation in the New Zealand setting (“Tales of constitutional origin and Crown sovereignty in New Zealand” (2002), 52 University of Toronto Law Journal at 69 – 99) as well as argued for a more sophisticated historiography of New Zealand legal history, a 'tradition' that he believes has yet to take root.

In 2004-6 he returned to common law aboriginal title in the wake of the New Zealand foreshore and seabed controversy when the Court applied common law principles following the arguments pioneered in his published work in the 1980s: See "Aboriginal title in New Zealand courts" (1984), 2 University of Canterbury Law Review 235-265 and "The legal status of Maori fishing rights in tidal water" (1984), 14 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 247-7. He appeared as independent witness before the Waitangi Tribunal (2004) and the Select Committee hearings (2005) and toured the country (under the aegis of the New Zealand Law Society) explaining the legal position. He has also been retained by the Canadian Department of Justice as independent witness in several major land claims.

[edit] Family

His mother was Pauline Mary McHugh (nee Barnao) (died 1991). His father Ashley George McHugh (died 1999), who became Deputy Chief Judge of the Maori Land Court and later chaired the Waitangi Tribunal's hearing of the Ngai Tahu Claim (see Treaty of Waitangi claims and settlements).

His civil partner (2006) is Andrew Hardwick.