User talk:ParthianShot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- You can leave me a message here, or *Email me!
[edit] Babek image
Hi, thanks for your efforts about the Babek picture. Unfortunately, it seems those CAIS people failed to tell you that they themselves based their page on Wikipedia, both the text (which is obviously based on the earlier text we had here) and probably the image (their copy seems to be a scaled-down version of ours, which in turn was taken earlier from the azeripainting site.) And of course, they've provided no explanation how they came to own the painter's copyright. Do they own the original painting? - Sorry, but I can't see how they can then license that thing back to us. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. I will send them an email to require about the origin and the source of the image. Usually it takes three working days to get a reply from them, in which I will inform you in due course. Regards ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 21:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, but the point is really, it doesn't matter terribly much where they got the electronic file from (though it's probably from us). What matters is that they are unlikely to have the actual painting in their possession, or that they have bought all the rights to it from the Azeri painter. The basic copyright is still his, or his heirs. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- I really don't know what Azari artist are you referring to; - However, the best and appropriate course of action is to make enquiries (as I did a few moments ago) and see what would be the result. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 22:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Uh, of course I mean the guy you refered to here [1], and who is credited as the painter on the original image upload page, Image:Babek.jpg: "by Azeri painter Sadıq Şərifzadə. 1944. From Azerbaijan Painting. Which is also the source we got the electronic file from, in April 2006. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hi again. The problem is solved! I have uploaded a new version of the image, in order to prevent any confession, until I get a result form CAIS. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk)
- Sigh. Unless the CAIS people painted that picture themselves, we'll have the exact same problem with this one as with the other. There's no plausible indication they own the copyright for this one either. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- As I mentioned earlier, it is logical method is to wait until CAIS get back to me! “Rome was not built over night” – Patience my friend, Patience! ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 09:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, no problem, we can wait a few days. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Dear fut.Perf. I have received communication from CAIS regarding the images. Shall I forward it to you, or copy and paste the email here? ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 15:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- As you wish; if they have no problem with it there should be no problem with pasting it here either. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- My apologies. It seems I cannot post it here since at the bottom of their email states: CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.! Thus I have to forward it to you via an email. What email address should I send it to? Regards ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 16:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- You can use the wiki e-mail function: Special:Emailuser/Future Perfect at Sunrise. Thanks! Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- My apologies. It seems I cannot post it here since at the bottom of their email states: CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.! Thus I have to forward it to you via an email. What email address should I send it to? Regards ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 16:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- As you wish; if they have no problem with it there should be no problem with pasting it here either. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Dear fut.Perf. I have received communication from CAIS regarding the images. Shall I forward it to you, or copy and paste the email here? ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 15:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, no problem, we can wait a few days. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- As I mentioned earlier, it is logical method is to wait until CAIS get back to me! “Rome was not built over night” – Patience my friend, Patience! ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 09:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Sigh. Unless the CAIS people painted that picture themselves, we'll have the exact same problem with this one as with the other. There's no plausible indication they own the copyright for this one either. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hi again. The problem is solved! I have uploaded a new version of the image, in order to prevent any confession, until I get a result form CAIS. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk)
- Uh, of course I mean the guy you refered to here [1], and who is credited as the painter on the original image upload page, Image:Babek.jpg: "by Azeri painter Sadıq Şərifzadə. 1944. From Azerbaijan Painting. Which is also the source we got the electronic file from, in April 2006. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- I really don't know what Azari artist are you referring to; - However, the best and appropriate course of action is to make enquiries (as I did a few moments ago) and see what would be the result. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 22:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, but the point is really, it doesn't matter terribly much where they got the electronic file from (though it's probably from us). What matters is that they are unlikely to have the actual painting in their possession, or that they have bought all the rights to it from the Azeri painter. The basic copyright is still his, or his heirs. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply. Yep, that e-mail should make it clear that the new version is okay, since they plausibly claim to own the copyright and they have clearly released it under GFDL. Thanks for your efforts and your patience in dealing with this! Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- My pleasure – anytime. Regards ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 15:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dr Darabi image
Hi ParthianShot! and thanks for your contributions. I have seen you added Dr Darabi's photo to Iranian women's movement page. If you don't mind I would like to transfer the image to "Human rights in Iran" (the section on women). The reason is that the former article mainly discuss what women achieved themselves and not what others did to them. "Human rights in Iran/section on women" instead discuss what others did to women. Thanks. Sangak 10:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. Please do what you see fit wit the location of the image. Regards ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 11:01, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nasreddin article, 3R rule.
It's not me but you who had deleted information from the article. If you consider that it was first you who had reverted my edits, than you would realize how funny to leave a message in my talk page about 3R rule. However, i'm open to discussions about the article. Please explain why you have removed my referenced information from the article ?
PS. You've once accused me to act like vandal in one of your edit explanations. I will be happy if you manage to refrain from personal attacks, esp to me.--BlueEyedCat 11:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- BTW, i've recently re-read the article and i find your last edits reasonable. I'm mostly fine with the current status of the article. (I've added some data about where he was born and lived)--BlueEyedCat 11:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- You been served with 3RR since you been in the breach of such a policy. Please check the records. With regard to your statement, I have not removed the citations that you have provided, but reinstated in a scholarly manner, than POV Pushing (please see: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. However, Vandalism is not a personal attack but a Wikipedia policy which is being observed by Wikipedians. However, I am more than happy to disuses this matter further, in relevant discussion page for future arbitrations, if required. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 11:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- All the edits are welcome, as long as are supported by reputable sources (not Turkish Ministry of Culture, since they have the habit of calling everyone Turk; i.e. Parthians, Scythians, ancient Anatolians etc.) ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 11:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- BTW: Although Turkish Ministry of Culture, does not consider as a neutral source, but I have NOT removed the citation. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 11:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- All the edits are welcome, as long as are supported by reputable sources (not Turkish Ministry of Culture, since they have the habit of calling everyone Turk; i.e. Parthians, Scythians, ancient Anatolians etc.) ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 11:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- You been served with 3RR since you been in the breach of such a policy. Please check the records. With regard to your statement, I have not removed the citations that you have provided, but reinstated in a scholarly manner, than POV Pushing (please see: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. However, Vandalism is not a personal attack but a Wikipedia policy which is being observed by Wikipedians. However, I am more than happy to disuses this matter further, in relevant discussion page for future arbitrations, if required. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 11:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- BTW, i've recently re-read the article and i find your last edits reasonable. I'm mostly fine with the current status of the article. (I've added some data about where he was born and lived)--BlueEyedCat 11:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thx
(-: Tājik 00:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:
Thanks alot, I'm thinking about making that article something like "Khackhar destruction" I'll add that as a reference or external link thanks alot :-) Artaxiad 11:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Persian transliteration
Salam!
Please see [2]. We need to change the WP:MoS for Persian transliteration. MoS forces us to use Arabic transliteration for Persian words. It makes no sense. Please see the problem I have now on transliteration of Kiarostami. [3]
- Let's make a guideline: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Persian) / WP:MOS-PE. ANy idea? I copy/pasted the Arabic guideline to my user page. let's work here first and then propose it. User:Sangak/Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Persian)
Sangak 13:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. I believe is a great idea and necessary one to create Persian transliteration. I suppose we have two options here - we can either deploy David N, Mackenzie’s transliteration, which is based on his predecessors, i.e. Richelt and Jackson, which currently is the model for the pre-Islamic Iranian languages, or Encyclopaedia Iranica. EI has number of extra constants, such as ح, ذ, ص, ض, ط, ظ, ع, ث and it is similar to Arabic WP:AMOS, (in Persian we do not pronounce them). I can copy the Mackenzie’s transliteration guideline here if you wish. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 06:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes please add Mackenzie’s transliteration. I strongly think we need to have a separate article for persian. Unfortunately this is a topic I am not familiar with. But I can appreciate the importance of having a well-defined and independent MoS for persian. Apart from technical issues, the examples used in MoS-Arabic are very annoying (Al-qaeda, Saddam, Abdel Nasser, Muawwieh, ...) Thanks. Sangak 09:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Sangak - I have added the Mackenzie’s transliteration in the relevant section as requested. Your endeavours is greatly admired and appreciated. Regards ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 07:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes please add Mackenzie’s transliteration. I strongly think we need to have a separate article for persian. Unfortunately this is a topic I am not familiar with. But I can appreciate the importance of having a well-defined and independent MoS for persian. Apart from technical issues, the examples used in MoS-Arabic are very annoying (Al-qaeda, Saddam, Abdel Nasser, Muawwieh, ...) Thanks. Sangak 09:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kiarostami: FAC
Hi
In case you are interested: I would like to invite you to comment on Abbas Kiarostami at this "final" stage. The article is now a featured article candidate. In case you have any comment, please let me know on the Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Abbas Kiarostami page. Thanks for your time. Sangak 19:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Wow I love that image!!! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 15:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:your note
Thanks for the transliteration. I hope both Kiarostami (currently GA) and Cinematic style of Abbas Kiarostami (currently GA) go through. It's tough but I am not hopeless yet :-) Sangak 08:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
Thanks :)), May Ormuzd bless you ! Sangak 11:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Daste shoma dard nakoneh. man kheili donbal e iek aks e khoob boodam ke "free" basheh. dorood bar shoma. Sangak 15:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New Wikiproject
I thought this might help to organise efforts for Persian language/literature related articles. To be honest I think at the moment the articles on Persian literature and poetry are in need of a lot of improvement. --Rayis 19:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Persian)
Please also participate in the discussion (in its talp page). Jahangard 19:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Saadi Statue Shiraz.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Saadi Statue Shiraz.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kiarostami was promoted!
Dear ParthianShot
I need to thank you (a "special thanks" for the nice image) for your kind assistance and support. The article would not come to FA status without your helps. Thanks and All the best. Sangak Talk 11:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Gondophares crest
Hi Parthian Shot. Would you have a reference for the "Crest of Gondophares according to Iranian sources". Do you know what are the Iranian sources in question? Regards PHG 08:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. Sure -- I'm going to add it to the text. PS. your artworks are great – very impressive. Regards. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 08:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Khahesh mikonam
Khahesh mikonam Khodayar khan. Ghabeli nadasht --Arad 14:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Babak
Hi, Parthian Shot. I'm wondering what your objection is to al-Tabari's account of Babak riding to his execution on an elephant and why you say he was betrayed by al-Afshin when al-Afshin was the prominent Abbasid general who defeated Babak? Best Wishes Gallador 18:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Galador - He was betrayed by Afshin, since both were Iranians, and were fighting for a common cause, i.e. to end the Arab rule in Iran. I believe most comprehensive article about Babak, has been written by Professor Gh. H. Yousefi, for Encyclopaedia Iranica link (and choose the entry B, number: 2060: BĀBAK KHORRAMĪ) that can answer to your question properly. Regards ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 05:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Parthian Shot. Thanks. I'll give that a read. I think to make it clear it would be better to put a sentence such as, "Nationalists consider al-Afshin was betraying his Iranian roots by opposing Babak," right after mentioning him leading forces against Babak. Have you read the material that comes later in at Tabari about Afshin's intriguing with Mazyar and other allegations made against Afshin after his arrest in 840? Be Well Gallador 18:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Partian shot. I'm fine with removing al here. I'm also happy with thinking about the wording of the betrayal explanation. The thing is if someone just reads at the end that Afshin betrayed Babak to the caliph, it doesn't make sense, because it seems Afshin was the caliph's general who defeated Babak and brought in a captured rebel. So, I think as soon as it's mentioned that Afshin is fighting against Babak it needs to be said some consider Afshin's fighting as betrayal. Then that could be specified. Who all is included in that sense of betrayal? Very Best Wishes Gallador 22:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Advieh
Hi, can you help expand Advieh (and add the Persian spelling)? Thank you, Badagnani 00:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the help. Is there anything in the Farsi WP article that we should add to the English one? Badagnani 18:12, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I just got a package of advieh for rice--it's called "advieh poloi." I think "poloi" is wrong so I added "advieh polo" in the Advieh article. Maybe it's actually "advieh-e-polo" or "advieh e polo." Can you help with the name for advieh for stews? Thank you, Badagnani 22:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Question
Hi, can you help me with a question? I wonder what is the etymology of the Persian word badinjan (eggplant). I used to think it was Arabic but it looks like it comes from Persian. Do you know, or can you look up/find the roots of this word? Thank you, Badagnani 03:12, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Congratulations
Cogratulations for passing your PhD exam. Also Nowruteztan Piroz. By the way I sent you two articles, did you receive them? If not please e-mail me again. --alidoostzadeh 20:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Khomeini 78.jpg
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Guard Javidan.jpg
.