User talk:Parallel or Together?
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome!
[edit] from jayanthv
thanx,i dont know wat a admin does anyway.but please dont block me.--Jayanthv86 14:59, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Parallel or Together?, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 20:48, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikiproject Calendars
Thank you for updating part of WikiProject Calendars This project is a dynamic one that changes every day. Every day, the highlighted day on the calendar must change. If you have time, please feel free to add holidays and update the highlighted day again in the future. |
If you have any questions, comments, or ideas, please feel free to leave a messaage on my talk page. --Munchkinguy 02:20, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Intelligent Design
I tried to explain the difference. Ask questions if it is not clear. --Swmeyer 21:37, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Moving a page
Hi, please use a 'move' button if you want to move a page to a different title. By copy-pasting it, like you did with Television crew, the history of that page does not move with it. To fix this, the new page has to be deleted for a short while (an admin can do that, I'll ask), and after that the move can be executed. It'd be probably a good idea to wait with new edits until that has happened, for they might get lost in the process... --JoanneB 10:14, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks and please stick around!
Sanity and reason is a nice thing on the ID and IDMovement talk pages - please stick around if you can manage the time. KillerChihuahua 14:25, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Replied on KC's talk page. - P or T? 15:04, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] The Bogrolls
I've speedied the other article, but I think it's better to AFD The Bogrolls instead. (I explained on the article's talk.) Johnleemk | Talk 11:14, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- Replied on Johnleemk's talk page. -- P or T? 11:18, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] S. R. Crown Hall/Crown Hall
I moved "Crown Hall" to "S.R. Crown Hall" because that is the official name of the building, and thus I thought should be the main page. A redirect from "Crown Hall" can easily take care of the common name, as should be the standard here.
I can understand either one though. New signage on the IIT campus (where I work) uses the full name, as does the new signage on the building itself (from the Summer 2005 rennovation) and the recently placed National historical marker. The Chicago marker, though, does just say "Crown Hall." I count that as an error on the city's part, an omission most likely due to no other buildings on IIT's campus (except the Paul V. Galvin Library) taking the whole name of the namesake. I'd defer to the Park Service before the City of Chicago. The national marker does refer to the building as "Crown Hall" within the plaque, so I think that again shows that while Crown Hall is the common name, S.R. Crown Hall is the official name and should be used first.
Also, please see the Crown Hall entry in the IIT Editorial Style Guide. In matters of naming, IIT should get the primary say since they are the owners. Here, it is preferred that the name "S.R. Crown Hall" is used in the first reference, then "Crown Hall" later. Apparently the Crown family has their name on many buildings at many universities, but this is the only "S.R." - Duncanr
- Replied on Duncanr's talk page. -P or T 00:48, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- I'll make sure and message first next time. I've been working on some IIT pages recently and had some random people changing things without reason or that didn't need to be changed. I appreciate your comments though. The article could have gone either way, I just preferred the full name since it seems to be making a comeback on campus and in case other Crown Halls were written about. Sorry for the surprise move. Take care. - Duncanr
-
-
- Replied on Duncanr's talk page. -P or T 02:48, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
-
[edit] Speedy deletion of bands
Hi there, Thanks for voting on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghosts of modern man. You mentioned that it was a possible speedy candidate. As PJM already mentioned, the criteria for speedy deletion don't include non-notable bands (lamentably in my opinion), only articles about people that do not assert notability.
While I hope that we will soon be able to take non-notable band articles to speedy deletion, for the moment we have to grit our teeth and send them through AFD. Stifle 22:59, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
- Replied on Stifle's talk page - P or T? 23:46, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- Yes, I fully agree that they should be speediable; it missed passing by 1% in the last vote :( Stifle 23:47, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Intelligent Archive
You appear to have deleted a large and mostly tedious lump from Talk:Intelligent design to move to Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 22, which seems to be somewhat missing. Any problem? ...dave souza 15:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
- Replied on dave souza's talk page. -P or T? 00:16, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
- My apologies, got FM's archiving mixed up with your edits. As you say, it seems to have been sorted out now. All well. ...dave souza 01:04, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Please see
User_talk:KillerChihuahua#Try_to_be_civil
KillerChihuahua?!? 14:29, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Replied on KC's talk page. -P or T 14:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Anti-vandal
Thanks! Everyking 06:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] re: talk message
Thanks for the message and the apology, I didn't mean to come across harsh if it seemed that way. As for me, I'm not really all that turned off from here because a few people said the things they did, I'm more turned off because of the general environment around here. A few of the reasons are in my "farewell address" if you want to call it that, but that article isn't exactly the place that I need to be spending my time if things are going to go like that. I'm im process of growing my own business and speaking across the country, plus work a full time job on top of that, with a family, and am in the beginning stages of writing a book, so it's just one more thing to take me away from what I'm focused on, and since I can't see anything productive coming from my time there, I've got to focus on other things.
At any rate, thanks for the message though, and good luck with the page. Barwick 14:59, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Replied on Barwick's talk page. - P or T? 09:55, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Block My IP Address?
You threaten me by stating "maybe we could block his IP Address?" Why would you suggest something like that? Are you suggesting some sort of attack on my computer?
You forget, sir, that this site is about contributing information or deleting bogus information from articles. If it quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, and smells like a duck, it is a duck. And that is why I presented the facts that I found, since egg-heads such as yourself have trouble seeing the forest for the trees.
Francis Crick was an atheist, and is appropriate for the Religious Beliefs section of the article. It is not appropriate to talk about a "talk show hosts" freudian analysis of him (which I attempted to delete since it is not appropriate, poorly written, boring, and was pointless). It was deleted by myself. If you have a problem with it, then you can change it back if that makes you feel good about yourself. Francis Crick also felt it was impossible for life to have come into being out of a primordial soup, and is appropriate for the Panspermia section of the article. It is not appropriate to say that he didn't have a belief or interest in it especially given the fact that he cowrote a book about it. These are facts, sir, not opinions.
I am not surprised, however, that a handful of "know it alls" such as yourself would threaten me with "we will find him and intimidate him with our knowledge of his IP address." Are you perhaps going to try to initiate an attack on my computer? Just let me say that I am not afraid of egg-heads such as yourself who spend their lives trying to destroy the only hope that billions of people have (i.e. God or some other universal spirit). So go ahead, egghead, do what you gotta do... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.207.83.81 (talk • contribs).
- Comment: My actual edit to anonymous user's talk page can be found here. User was later blocked for one month by Zoe. - P or T? 10:12, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Merry Christmas
I would like to wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and all the best for the New Year. Guettarda 17:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Sandbox
Could you check it over, we can do it now. Or tomorrow... I'm actually getting kinda tired. :"D - RoyBoy 800 06:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Replied on RB's talk page. -P or T? 06:28, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- Coo, yeah I'll propose it now, but the if its adopted we can add it in after the fact; with FM's permission of course. I just posted it on meta, thanks for your support; you're well wishes... many without a computer for weeks... I hope the Wikiwithdraw isn't too bad! :"D Have a good one! - RoyBoy 800 06:48, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
-
[edit] Thanks so much
When I think of all of us who worked together so hard for so long, I think of the line from Henry V We few, we happy few, we band of brothers...
It was a fun ride, wasn't it? So thanks you guys, that meant a lot to me.
Who did the Thelonious with a mop artwork? Brilliant! FeloniousMonk 08:17, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Tagging pages proposal
Hi there, I'm writing because at some point you showed interest in a proposal to solve the problems related to national varieties of English. There is a discussion and a vote ongoing here. Please take a look and let us know what you think. Thanks. PizzaMargherita 14:53, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar templates
Work continues on further templates. - RoyBoy 800 03:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on RB's talk page. -P or T? 02:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] KC's RFA
Just wanted to let you know that you forgot to sign your vote. Guettarda 13:50, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- You might want to change "sysop" to "admin" too. Just a thought. How was your vacation, btw? Wonderful I hope? KillerChihuahua?!? 02:18, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- Replied on Guettarda and KC's talk pages. -P or T? 02:23, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you!
Thanks for supporting me on my Rfa, PoT! I'm glad you got back from your vacation in time, too - I'm glad to hear it was a good one! and I appreciate your trust and kind words. The puppy is now an Admin (not sysop :P) (final tally 58/7/2) Please let me know if there is anything I can ever do to assist you. KillerChihuahua?!? 18:00, 14 January 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Bullying
PoT? you might want to take a look at this...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Benapgar/Bullying
Jim62sch 11:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on Jim's talk page and endorsed FeloniousMonk's outside opinion in the matter. -P or T? 02:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
PoT? -- thanks for the reply. I've tried using logic and reason with Ben, but to no avail -- although it is likely that anything I say to him falls on deaf ears anyway (the same applies to FM (obviously), KillerChihuahua, Guettarda, Dunc and now Ghost). And yes, I suppose that some things did get out of hand -- mostly because none of us were expecting the ad homs (we were kind of blind-sided) and reacted accordingly. The real issue though, is that Ben seems to either totally misunderstand how Wiki works, or more likely, wants to redefine the rules so they fit his idea of what they should be. OK, enough of my ranting, thanks for your assistance. Take care, Jim62sch 10:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] | | ⊕ ⊥
That's a splendid idea. ;) —Nightstallion (?) 13:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Check out Nightstallion's talk page for further comments. ⇔ | | ⊕ ⊥ (t-c-e) 14:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wrong Jamie
Sorry, wrong Jamie. Sadly, I haven't been in a band for a long time. I did download an mp3 ("Openly") by Jenoah [1] just for kicks; it's actually really good. The prog rock/punk fusion element reminds me of some of my favorite Rob Crow projects including Thingy and Heavy Vegetable. OhnoitsJamieTalk 05:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
for protecting my user page. Cheers. PJM 12:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:24.55.228.56
Hi - I am seeking support for a user conduct RfC on User:24.55.228.56 (apparently also known as User:Mr j galt) over his conduct on the Plame pages and the Larry C. Johnson page - would you sign on? RfC requires that at least two users tried and failed to resolve the dispute with the user, and I believe that has happened in this case. Let me know and I will propose the RfC. --csloat 08:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] from jayanthv
Hello ,thanks for opening my eyes.I am such a loser,I dont even know what a admin does and i have nominated myself.from now on,i will leave edit summaries.I am barely two months old in wiki and i was audacious enough to ask for adminship.Sorry for wasting your time.--Jayanthv86 15:23, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA nom
Thank you for the reminder, I was called into work on an emergency situation and have only just got home. -- Francs2000 00:23, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed policy
Hi, you recently commented on bible-verse articles, and may therefore be interested in commenting about a proposed policy covering roughly 50 specific verses:
--Victim of signature fascism 20:13, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
Many thanks for participating in my RfA. Although you voted neutral, I appreciate the kind comments you made and hope we'll be able to collaborate on something in the future. All the best, Jamyskis
Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 16:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you!
I rather doubt any other association could overtake the one calling for a combination of humor and common sense, but my RfA succeeded anyway, 71/1/0! Thank you for your supporting vote, which propelled me onto the RfA records! ;) Ashibaka tock 00:22, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:Ohnoitsjamie's RfA
I really appreciate your support for my admin nomination, especially with me being a relatively new user. Cheers, OhNoitsJamieTalk 04:08, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My RFA
Hi Parallel or Together?, thanks for participating in my RfA discussion. Unfortunately, my fellow Wikipedians have decided at this time that I am not suitable to take on this additional responsibility, as the RfA failed with a result of 66/27/5 (71.0% support). If you voted in support of my request, thank you! If you decided to oppose me at this time, then I hope that if I do choose to reapply in the future, the effort I will make in the meantime to improve and expand my contributions to Wikipedia may persuade you to reconsider your position. All the best, Proto t c 10:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reminder...
— Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 02:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Back?
Good to see you around again. Welcome back. Guettarda 13:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP:FILMS Newsletter
The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP:FILMS Newsletter
The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP:Films Newsletter
The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 06:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Films February Newsletter
The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 23:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Films February Newsletter
The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 23:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] March WP:FILMS Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by Cbrown1023 talk 00:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)