Talk:Partnership
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale. | |
| Top | This article has been assessed as Top-importance on the assessment scale. | |
Removed:
-
- Stanley went to find Livingstone
It was listed under
- Examples of personal partnerships:
but it should stay removed (unless it is verified they were secret lovers!): Stanley was a reporter in search of a story. He sent back gripping tales of East Africa, succeeded in picking up Livingstone's trail and, since they were strangers, wrote that he greeted him with "Dr. Livingstone, I presume", obviously the proper Victorian upper-class-twit greeting before introducing yourself to a complete stranger.
--Jerzy(t) 16:37, 2004 Aug 20 (UTC)
Passive shareholder redirects here, can someone explain why? That explanation would also need to be worked into the article. --Bjarki 14:15, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
I don't see that there's much need to sdakeep brackets around the phrase "nominate contract". I doubt that could be worked up as a decent article -- at best, a dict def. Anybody agree? --Christofurio 20:41, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
The article states that general partners have "strict liability" to persons injured by the partnership. This may be true in some jurisdictions with respect to certain kinds of harm, but is not universally true. What is universally true (at least in common law countries) is that general partners have unlimited liability to recourse creditors of the partnership. See Black's Law Dictionary, definition of "general partner." 66.181.94.5 21:13, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
This article can be improved by including the provisions of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Tamilmani.R 02.03.2007
[edit] Why is that link a "must read"
Has anyone actually looked at that link? It's garbage! Indiahowto.com? The URL should be the first tip off that such a citation is a joke, the second tip off is "must read."
