Talk:Parallax scrolling
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
|
CVG To-do:
|
||
 |
This article may be too technical for a general audience. Please help improve this article by providing more context and better explanations of technical details to make it more accessible, without removing technical details. See below for more information. |
Shouldnt this be moved to Parallax Scrolling ?
- Agree. - furrykef (Talk at me) 05:43, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Too technical?
I've moved this from Parallax scroll. However, I'm feeling that this article seems a little too technical, and I'm having some difficulty understanding how this works. Could anybody makes this a little more clear? Oklonia 00:27, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- The "layer way" of parallax scrolling is a method of suggesting three dimensions during animation by having objects that are farther away scroll slower than objects in front of them. For a Flash example of this, check out http://joesparks.shockwave.com/production/productionnote_02.htm. Not sure about the "raster way" though. CHz 04:08, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I just finished adding a boatload of background information that should help explain the techniques. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 05:19, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
- I think that while the use of raster techniques, was highly prevalent in the early days of computer animation - it's not really relevant to this article. The right place for raster interrupt techniques is in a specialised area or article directly related to 8-bit computing. They are interesting and important things to be documented, and they could be linked to from here in a 'Implementing Parallax Scrolling in Early Graphical Computer Systems' style link - but the information isn't directly related to the topic at hand. zen_tom 14:47, 18 October 2005
- Clarified. Raster effects are still relevant today, as many TV games and handhelds are similar to the 3rd and 4th generation consoles. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 19:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- I think that while the use of raster techniques, was highly prevalent in the early days of computer animation - it's not really relevant to this article. The right place for raster interrupt techniques is in a specialised area or article directly related to 8-bit computing. They are interesting and important things to be documented, and they could be linked to from here in a 'Implementing Parallax Scrolling in Early Graphical Computer Systems' style link - but the information isn't directly related to the topic at hand. zen_tom 14:47, 18 October 2005
- I just finished adding a boatload of background information that should help explain the techniques. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 05:19, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
- That's a good example, I think I'll make that an external link in the article. WikiSlasher 07:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- I’ve added a deconstructed example to demonstrate the concept. I realise it’s fantastically ugly; hopefully someone will find it so embarrasing that they create a better one to replace it. Be bold and all that. -Ahruman 14:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Parallax scrolling and Pseudo-3D merging?
I just made major edits on Pseudo-3D. Parallax scrolling and Pseudo-3D are not synonymous. Parallax scrolling is "moving the camera vertically or horizontally, with different layers moving at different speed, therefore giving the feeling of depth". Pseudo-3D is any illusion that gives you the depth perception you usually get by the true geometric rules of a threedimensional world has while only making this illusions with concepts and rules of a twodimensional world.
Therefore I would say, Parallax scrolling is a subfield of Pseudo-3D. Yet, parallax scrolling is of such great importance to cartoons, computer games etc. that I would prefer to have a separate article for it. --Abdull 12:51, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
I liked the animation and explanation of Parallax scrolling. However, it says "By moving layer 2 twice as fast as layer 1, and layer 3 twice as fast as layer 1, a suggestion of perspective is achieved". Shouldn't it be "By moving layer 2 twice as fast as layer 1, and layer 3 twice as fast as layer 2, a suggestion of perspective is achieved". As a matter of fact, the two middle-layers are moving at the same speed, thus defeating the purpose of having 2 and not 1 layer there.
- The layers are all moving at different speeds, although I appreciate that this isn’t very visible. Layer 3 is in fact moving three times as fast as layer 1. I did say it was fantastically ugly. :-) -Ahruman 16:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
