User talk:Panarchy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi this is Panarchy here! Why hasn't anyone posted a comment yet? Come on people I'm not asking for money, all I'm asking for is acknowledgment! Thanks for taking the time to read this (Meaningless dribble!) comment.

Panarchy 12:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Minefield

Hey, do you realize that there is a reason that every time you start an article on Minefield it gets deleted or redirected to Mozilla Firefox? Just because you create it at a new location doesn't mean it's good enough.--XMBRIAN 23:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)



So what do you think the article needs to stop people from deleting it?

Panarchy 23:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Not existing. Then people can't delete it.  :) Seriously though, it's not notable enough of an article. Nothing can be done to change that. Sorry. --XMBRIAN 00:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] MY REPLY!

It is a web browser on its own! How can you be so stupid? Also stop deleting my account. I haven't made or changed anymore articles so stop!

Panarchy 01:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


ummm... i'm not sure if that was directed at me, but if it was, I would have no way of deleting anything on Wikipedia. And Minefield is NOT a browser on it's own. It WAS the name of a pre-alpha release of Firefox 3, which is now in alpha 1, and it is now called Gran Paradiso. And as for being stupid, I'm not the one who keeps saying that a pre-alpha version of a browser is a browser on it's own, now, am I?--XMBRIAN 03:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yes, but!

The browser works on it's own and by the way is in pre-alpha 2 now.

And that browser is meant to be a code name for Firefox 3. Meaning, once Firefox 3 has been released, no more Minefield or Gran Paridiso.--XMBRIAN 23:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop creating these articles

How have you not realized that Minefield is not worthy enough to have an article on it? How many pages need to be deleted and protected? Does it have to go to the point where an admin has to block you from editing to stop this?--XMBRIAN 17:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I have redirected the latest Minefield article to Mozilla Firefox as discussed. If you continue to create this page or variations of it, you will be blocked for disruption. Thanks --Aguerriero (talk) 19:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Minefield

First off, I can't view the message as this is what I got: Sorry, but you do not have permission to use this feature. If you are not logged in, you may do so using the form below if available.

Second: I don't know how I can make it any clearer.. THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO TO MAKE THE ARTICLES STAND! First of all, Minefield isn't even an alpha of Firefox 3, it's simply the nightly builds of the trunk for Firefox 3. It is in NO way a web browser on its own.

Anyone looking for info on Firefox 3 naturally would look at the Mozilla Firefox article anyway.--XMBRIAN 23:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:MineField.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MineField.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)