Wikipedia:Pages needing attention/Rivers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Rivers

  • Portals (see above)
  • WikiProjects
  • Categories covered
  • Stubs
    • (see location-specific stubs)
  • To be manually checked, deleted or moved to article's talk page:
    • Deûle appears to be a machine translation of an article written in French. I cleaned up what I could, but someone who speaks French could give this article the help it needs. There is a link to the French wikipedia entry it apparently came from. Mwanner 02:15, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)
    • List of British Columbia rivers attempts to list rivers ordered by watershed, yet has various blank and questioned entries. It needs someone familiar with the topic and area to finish the job. If no one steps up to that, then it needs to be converted to an alphabetical or other ordering that mere mortals could more easily contribute to... 66.167.139.215 00:40, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
    • The Amazon River. An article I feel has a lot of potential and already a great deal of information. It is, however, not very readable. I needs some skilled editing to improve the writing as well as the layout (headings etc.) -- Solitude 10:08, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
      • I edited this for readability and appearance. This could use some attention to the metric vs english system of measurement, some units are feet, some are metres, some are both. Also the article slips back and forth between American English and English at times. there is also a bit, noted on its discussion page, about someone exploring "fifty metres inland" seems to be a verrrry minimal exploration if that measurement is correct. Can someone with the resources check that figure? I've done all I can for the night Pedant 08:07, 2004 Oct 24 (UTC)
    • List of Ontario rivers - The hierarchal view is in bad shape; the entire St. Lawrence system is in a non-hierarchal order (the Great Lakes do drain into each other!), and some major rivers seem to go missing when many minor ones are piled on. Radagast

Do not add text below this point