Wikipedia:Pages needing attention/Health science miscellaneous

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Health science miscellaneous

  • To be manually checked, deleted or moved to article's talk page:
  • Human echolocation needs some review and I suspect it lacks NPOV. I am not an expert in this field, but this article seems to present as fact something that I understood to be just a theory. Also it is written and edited by a single, anon, user. Pasd 15:34, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Fomite - I'm not sure where this is going or what its context is. -FZ 19:52, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
It seems grossly okay to me...what bothers you specifically? -- JVinocur 23:07, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
It's fine now- at the time I commented, it wasn't clear whether this was a term in medicine, materials science, or humor studies. It's much improved since.-FZ 20:09, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Sneeze โ€” No references, few medical and anatomical facts, but lots of superstitions. The article has a history of factual disputes, and even in its current form I find much of its content doubtful. Anyone with a knowledge of sneezing can improve this. --PJF (talk) 11:34, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Aortic aneurysm - there are new methods for treatment, should be added, i don't know them but i will try and talk someone into doing it haha. rhyax 06:00, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC) If this is added, attention should also be given to aneurysm of sinus of Valsalva.
  • Universal precautions - quite incomplete in my opinion. I added a list of body fluids to be avoided and several things of the sort, but it needs a lot of work. --Victor 03:01, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: Eye is getting out-of-hand with the amount of content that is duplicated from its sub-articles. (Pehaps I'll nominate it for this page!) The first two suggestions would be better. Edwardian 07:41, 9 August 2005 (UTC)


โ€” Do not add text below this point โ€”