Talk:P. K. van der Byl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] question on PK's post-Independence role
I saw PK campaign in Zimbabwe for the Mt Pleasant (white) constituency in the House of Assembly in the 1985 election. As stated on the main page, he lost this election. I had thought that he was then appointed to the Zimbabwe Senate for a 5-year term (1985-1990), at one point receiving public criticism for non-attendance, because he had already moved to South Africa. Does anyone know if this is indeed the case?
He also famously spoke in favour of socialism in a debate in Parliament after Independence.
A claim he made in 1985 was that his father, as a South African cabinet minister, was responsible for banning "Ishe Kombarere Afrika", a nationalist hymn which became the national anthem of Zimbabwe after Independence.
2006-06-13.
[edit] recent edits
David. I had barely entered the new text before your editing started. That said, you have definitely improved it. Bob BScar23625 12:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry about that! Edit conflicts can be annoying, I know. Feel free to add more. David | Talk 12:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] more recent edits
David, a lot of improvements there. I am sure I could make use of your services on a professional basis. Leave that one with me. Bob BScar23625 11:01, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
ps I think the Otto von Hapsburg referred to in the article was not the individual that your link related to. My guess is that the one in question (Princess Charlotte's uncle) was the Austrian royal who was banned from Austria but became a right-wing German/Bavarian MEP. I have taken the liberty of removing the link.
pps Sorry, you are right and I was wrong on this. You linked to the correct Otto von Hapsburg. Easy to get confused. Bob BScar23625 16:45, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] depth of research
David, I am really stunned by the depth and quality of research that has gone into this. You have even identified some of the obscure sources from which I had pinched memorable turns of phrase. Here is a question to test your abilities to the limit. The article contains the following section of text referring to the Lancaster House agreement :
PK greeted the event with amused detachment.
What is the source of that?.
Bob BScar23625 08:05, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, no clues. No matter whether you are talking about a footballer or a political researcher, there is a quantum difference between the capabilities of someone who does the work on an occasional basis for fun and someone who does the work on a full time basis for a living. Bob BScar23625 15:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] events of 1979 - 1980
David, in the opening comments you write "He was a cabinet member from 1968 to 1980". Are you sure that is correct?. My understanding is that the Muzorewa 'internal settlement' government ended on the day that Soames arrived as Governor. PK therefore ceased to be a Minister in 1979, not 1980. The government departments continued under the Governor with the civil servants still in place, but there were no Ministers. Or, that has always been my understanding. Am I right?. Bob BScar23625 15:50, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Recommendations from the peerreviewer script
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question.
- See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[1]
- Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.[2] - Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:BTW, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006, but do not link January 2006.[3]
- Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
- Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
Allpigs are pink, so we thought ofa number ofways to turn them green.”
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
- As is done in WP:FOOTNOTE, for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change blah blah [2]. to blah blah.[2]
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a. [4]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Wim van Dorst (Talk) 23:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Spelling of kopje/koppie
Does anyone know if the following sentence was actually written or merely said by van der Byl?
"If the battle should wax fiercer, there can be no question of surrender. We shall contest every river, every crossroads, every village, every town and every kopje."
In South African English the Afrikaans spelling koppie is always used, not the Dutch kopje, which would be regarded as archaic. Presumably the situation would be the same in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe. Dutch has not been used for many decades. Therefore if the quote was not actually a written one, which of course cannot be changed, I think kopje should be changed to koppie. After all the word koppie has entered the English language, whereas I would not say the Dutch version has.
Booshank. The source of the quote is PK. As you see, the word there is "kopje". Bob BScar23625 06:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- To add to that, the hill just south of the centre of Salisbury/Harare is definitely called 'Kopje'. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 08:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Fair enough if this is the case. Zimbabwe must follow a different spelling from SA. Booshank 15:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
This is a great article. I'd never heard of this man before, despite having an interest in Rhodesia. He sounds like a fascinating, yet repellent individual - sort of a cross between Lord Haw Haw and Alan Clark. The article is well balanced, even though the man is clearly a grotesque phoney. Patrick Franzen 20:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note - you sum PK up very well, based on what I found when I was researching him. Credit should go to Bob for starting the article and providing a base on which the facts could be placed. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 09:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dan Van der Vat quote
It is highly insulting, it is POV, but it is relevant because Dan Van der Vat was based in Rhodesia during the UDI period and observed PK closely. We don't endorse the quote, or repudiate it, but we report it as a significant expression of opinion. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 14:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's quite inappropriate... because it is downright misleading. It might be a quote, but it's part of the article and isn't just opinion—it's an attack. The article shouldn't close with a PK bashing trip. michael talk 15:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- I don't understand why it is misleading? It isn't a misquote. It is a direct quote from an obituary, clearly written by a detractor, but then as Fys says it isn't endorsed. I can't see what the excitement is about - unflattering quotes / facts in articles do not represent bias --SandyDancer 16:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Michael. You have previously described yourself as an admirer of Smithy and UDI. Are you also an admirer of PK?. best wishes. Bob BScar23625 14:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Bob, you clearly know what you are talking about &c, however, I hope you aren't asking that question with the implication it is a bad thing to admire PK. I should be more than happy to state that I am an admirer of PK, and Smith and all the rest. What are your views Bob?--Couter-revolutionary 18:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Couter-revolutionary My own view is that racism is a fundamental evil. One encounters people who are admirers of apartheid and its local variants because they have little sense for what it was all about. Also, some of the people who were involved in it have since seen their error. I would put Smithy himself in that category, although he has never said as much. In my exchanges with Michael, I have tried to encourage him to have a think about the matter. I haven’t made much impression on him so far, but one must never give up hope. regards. Bob BScar23625 18:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think highly of Smith and I know little of PK so I cannot offer my thoughts there. I am no racist... I do not believe any group is better than another... I count people of many ancestries among my own friends and am somewhat puzzled by this being about such a thing.
- What I am opposed to, quite simply, is putting such a dreadful and unhelpful quote in the article... the thing reads like an extended newspaper feature so to top it off with that quote is bizarre. The effect? Everyone who reads it agrees that he is a 'dreadful character'—and that article is probably the most easily accessible and detailed one available on the man. michael talk 02:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Michael. I put Smithy into the same category as American segregationist politicians like George Wallace and Strom Thurmond. All of them advocated racist views at some stage in their careers then had a change of heart later in life. George Wallace started out as a civil rights lawyer, then switched to segregationist politician, then switched back to a pro-civil rights position. How far these public changes of view reflected conscience and how far they were merely opportunist is open to question.
But what I am asking you to consider is how it is possible to admire someone who openly espouses racist views, without being a racist yourself. best wishes. Bob BScar23625 08:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- I believe there is far more on which to judge someone than their views on race, no matter how controversial (and despite how much popular attention is paid to them). It is likely that my own ancestors, like those of all of us, held racist views; does that mean I should not admire them as people? michael talk 08:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Michael. Yes, but Smithy wasn't your Grandad. He was a career politician and you can only judge him on what he did and said in the world of politics. Up to the early 1980s, Smithy was an avowed racist who promoted white supremacy through violent means. PK was an even more extreme case of this. How can you admire such people without admiring their racism?. regards. Bob BScar23625 11:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Given the strength of your views ("an avowed racist who promoted white supremacy through violent means") I doubt there is enough room on this page to conjure a response to your satisfaction. I do not condone or agree with particular extremities of Smith's (former?) views, yet, on the whole, I admire him as a person. michael talk 11:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Michael. George Wallace was a racist governor of Alabama who is famous (among other things) for opposing the admission of black students to the state University. However, after large numbers of black voters were enrolled, he experienced a sudden change of heart and was re-elected governor with black support.
The word was that Smithy considered re-entering active politics in the 1990s. Had he done so and stood for office, I suspect that he would have discovered how wrong he had been to oppose majority rule. Actually, in his case the likely line would be that he had been misunderstood and he had favoured majority rule all along. Perhaps you think I am being cynical?. Bob BScar23625 12:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] PK accent
Counter-revolutionary. I never heard PK speak but all accounts indicate that the accent was more Lord Haw Haw than Cambridge. Witness comments quoted in the article by Douglas Hurd and Dan van der Vat to name but two. Your claim that the origin of his strange style of speech was a Cambridge education is surely just speculation?. best wishes. Bob BScar23625 09:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
ps. Come to think of it, I heard him speaking on TV in the 1970s and 80s. Definitely Lord Haw Haw and not Cambridge. BScar23625 09:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- An upper-class Rhodesian/South African who 'picked up' an upper-class English accent was most likely to do so at school. PK was not sent to school in England, he did, however, attend university here. Thus it is appropriate to imagine that it was here that his accent developed. To compare it to William Joyce is unnecessary. He would not have been exposed to RP accents before he attended Cambridge (I can't recall where his father was at school). It seems this article is attempting to discredit PK via his accent. For those that believe it was affected there are those who also believe it was a product of his education - I am attempting to illustrate this.--Counter-revolutionary 10:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Counter-revolutionary. RP (received pronunciation(?)) English is the kind of thing you hear on the main BBC news bulletins. That is not the same as upper-class English. William Joyce was an American born Irishman, who tried to pass himself off as an upper class Englishman. PK was a South African Dutchman who also tried to pass himself off as an upper class Englishman. It is actually very difficult to pass yourself off as anything you are not - and the result in the cases of both Joyce and PK was quite grotesque.
As an aside, one could describe William Joyce as an upper class Irishman. I believe that Joyce got a first class degree in English from Birkbeck College, London. Do you feel that the accent that Joyce used in his Lord Haw Haw broadcasts was the result of his social background and education - or do you think he was just "putting it on"?. best wishes. Bob BScar23625 12:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
ps : why have you changed the spelling of your Username?
-
- Without going into numerous socio-linguistic debates (which don't interest me terribly) RP (yes, Received Pronunciation) and an "upper-class" accent do share a common ground. Some believe the "upper-class" accent developed from the nobility attempting to imitate the German accent of the House of Hanover. That is an aside however.
-
- Joyce was putting it on; firstly he wasn't really an upper-class Irishman (he was a R. Catholicm (for a start) and went to school in Ireland - "upper-class" Catholics went to school in France/Italy and "upper-class" protestants went to England). Thus it was not the product of his social upbringing.
-
- For PK it is different. He was educated in England and, although he may have helped the development of his accent along, there is no doubt that his time at Cambridge influenced it.
-
- I changed my name to correct the original typing er'r. --Counter-revolutionary 12:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Counter-revolutionary. Thanks for your comments concerning the origin of the upper-class accent, which interested me. William Joyce's father was a property owner and landlord. I believe he was a cousin of the writer James Joyce. You might not consider him strictly upper-class, but I would.
You are aware of Joyce's history as head of propaganda for the British Union of Fascists in the 1930s and his subsequent career in German radio. Do you perceive any connection between this and PK's role as Minister of Information in the UDI regime in Rhodesia?. regards. Bob BScar23625 15:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- I see no connection between the two. --Counter-revolutionary 16:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- It's original research to say PK did not have his accent before Cambridge, but it's definitely true to say he had it there, because we have a good source for his nickname. And it's definitely true to say that most people who heard him thought it was a phony accent. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 12:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)