Owen Dixon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Owen Dixon
Owen Dixon

In office
1952 – 1964
Preceded by John Latham
Succeeded by Garfield Barwick

Born 1886
Hawthorn, Victoria
Died 1972

Sir Owen Dixon OM GCMG KBE PC (1886 - 1972) Australian judge and diplomat, was the sixth Chief Justice of Australia. A justice of the High Court for thirty-five years, Dixon is widely regarded as Australia's greatest ever jurist.

Contents

[edit] Education

Dixon was born in Hawthorn in suburban Melbourne in 1886. His father, J.W Dixon, was a barrister and subsequently a solicitor. He attended Hawthorn College and later the University of Melbourne, graduating with an Arts degree in 1907. During this time he developed his lifelong love of the classics. His BA became an MA, as was the custom then, a year later upon the payment of a small fee. He also studied law at Melbourne and graduated LLB in 1908, although he did not take his final honours exam, probably because he was working too much at the time, perhaps helping out in his father's law office. He was later awarded honorary doctorates from Harvard, Oxford and perhaps somewhat belatedly, Melbourne.

[edit] Legal career

Dixon was admitted to the Victorian Bar in 1910. In December 1911, Dixon appeared before the High Court of Australia for the first time, aged just 25 years. After a slow start, his career there was stellar, and he became a King's Counsel in 1922. In the 1920s, Dixon was a prominent member of the Victorian Bar, along with his colleagues and friends John Latham (who preceded Dixon as Chief Justice) and Robert Menzies (later the longest serving Prime Minister of Australia). He regularly appeared in the High Court of Australia and the Privy Council in London. At the time of his appointment to the High Court in 1929, he was the acknowledged leader of the Bar in Victoria, and indeed Australia. In 1920, he married Alice Brooksbank (1893-1971). They had four children, Franklin (1922-1977), Ted (1924-1996), Betty (1928- ) and Anne (1934-1979).

[edit] Judicial career

In 1926, Dixon was briefly made an Acting Judge of the Supreme Court of Victoria, and although he was considered to be an excellent judge, he did not enjoy the experience. In 1929, Dixon was appointed to the bench of the High Court, by his friend Latham, who was then the Commonwealth Attorney-General. During his time on the bench, Dixon also wrote several judgements on behalf of his colleague, Sir George Rich. The propriety of one judge writing a judgment under the name of another has never been determined. Dixon rapidly established himself as a dominant intellectual force on the High Court bench, and many of his judgments from the 1930s and 1940s are still regarded as classic statements of the common law. Examples are McDonald v Dennys Lascelles Ltd (1933) 48 CLR 457 (terms contracts), Brunker v Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd (1937) 57 CLR 555 (gifts, property), Yerkey v Jones (1939) 63 CLR 649 (Equity) and Penfolds Wines v Elliott (1946) 74 CLR 204 (personal property torts). Dixon also showed that behind his formidable command of legal principle he had a sense of fairness, such as in his joint judgment in Tuckiar v R (1934) 52 CLR 335, where the Court quashed the murder conviction of an aboriginal man who had not been given a fair trial.

Dixon had reservations about the appointment of Labour politicians Dr Herbert Vere Evatt and Sir Edward McTiernan by the Scullin Government in late 1930 (and is said to have considered resigning in protest). He nevertheless forced himself to get along with all his colleagues, and at one point acted as a go between between them and the irascible Sir Hayden Starke, who refused to have any communication with them. He and Evatt wrote a number of joint judgments prior to Evatt's resignation in 1940 to return to politics.

From 1942 to 1944, Dixon took leave from his judicial duties while he served as Australia’s Minister (Ambassador) to Washington, at the request of the then Prime Minister John Curtin. On May 27, 1950, Dixon was invited by the United Nations to act as their official mediator between the governments of India and Pakistan over the disputed territory of Kashmir. His role was to continue conciliation talks between the two nations in the lead up to a proposed plebiscite to be put to the residents of Kashmir. His role as mediator ended in October 1950, although he had left India in September frustrated with what he saw as an inability of the respective governments to negotiate.

At about this period, Dixon was in the majority in important Constitutional cases which declared unconstitutional pet projects of successive Labour and Liberal Governments, namely the Banks Nationalisation case (1948) 76 CLR 1 and the Communist Party case (1951) 83 CLR 1. In the former, he considered that many of the operative provisions of the Chifley Government's Banking Act 1947 (which sought to nationalise Australia's banks) were beyond the scope of the consitutional powers of the Australian Commonwealth Parliament. In the latter case he considered that the Communist Party Dissolution Act 1950 of the Liberal Government led by his old friend Robert Menzies (which sought to ban the Australian Communist Party) was 'ultra vires' (beyond power) for the Commonwealth Parliament, and could not be supported by any head of Commonwealth legislative power.

In 1951, Dixon was appointed a member of the Privy Council, the English judicial organ which, at that stage, was the final court of appeal in Australian legal matters. However, Dixon never took up his seat on that Court. In fact, Dixon's disdain for the Privy Council is well documented, particularly in Phillip Ayres' biography, titled Owen Dixon. Here, it is revealed that Dixon approached then-Prime Minister Robert Menzies on at least two occasions, urging a restriction of appeals to the Privy Council. In Dixon's view, the council had a limited understanding of Australian Constitutional law, allowed appeals on trivial matters, and published confusing judgements. His words to Menzies were "I do not think they have a clue."

In 1952, Dixon was appointed Chief Justice of the High Court by his friend Robert Menzies, who remained Prime Minister throughout Dixon’s tenure in the position. This marked the beginning of a period described by Lord Denning as the "golden age" of the High Court. Complemented by the work of Justices Kitto, Fullagar and Windeyer, Dixon led what Justice Spigelman has described as "one of the great common law benches of history." It may come as a surprise, then, that this period was one of relative stability in the area of Australian Constitutional Law. This was in part due to Dixon's leadership of his Court, which resulted in a higher proportion of joint judgments than before or since. The most notable decisions from this period include R v Kirby; ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia (Boilermakers' Case) (1956) and Victoria v Commonwealth (Second Uniform Tax Case) (1957). As Chief Justice he was also responsible for a number of seminal decisions in areas as diverse as contract law (e.g. Masters v Cameron (1957) 91 CLR 353) and criminal law and precedent (Parker v R (1963) 111 CLR 610). In Tait v R (1962) 108 CLR 620, he dramatically intervened to prevent the hanging of a mentally ill murderer before his appeal to the High Court could be heard.

In 1952, and again in 1955, Dixon was called upon by the Governor of Victoria to give advice when the upper house refused to pass supply bills. Dixon advised the Governor of his powers in such a situation. This precedent was followed after Dixon's death, when then-Governor-General Sir John Kerr sought advice from Sir Garfield Barwick CJ before dismissing the Labor Government under Gough Whitlam in 1975.

Dixon retired from the High Court in 1964, to be replaced by Sir Garfield Barwick, who as a barrister had argued for the Commonwealth in the Communist Party Case, and of whom Dixon disapproved. Dixon is said to have thought that Keith Aickin QC (subsequently a judge of the High Court 1976 - 1982) a more appropriate choice. Shortly after his retirement, Dixon turned down an offer to be appointed Australia's Governor General, because he considered himself "too old".

Dixon has sometimes been described as a product of his times – for example, he was a strong supporter of the White Australia policy, and was a critic of most organized religions ands, as Ayers' work shows, a virulent anti-Catholic. Furthermore, he had a strong involvement with several politicians of the day, notably Robert Menzies, and on occasion gave "advice" to federal ministers on foreign policy matters. This might not now be regarded as proper for a serving judge, though one must consider that, in Dixon's time, the pool of available talent and expertise available to Government was much smaller. This led to both Dixon and his predecessor Latham being used by successive Commonwealth Governments on diplomatic and other international missions. Conversely, Dixon is remembered primarily for his attitude of "strict and complete legalism" in his approach to contentious issues, and is considered by some to be among the least politically influenced judges. [1] For these and many other reasons, he is widely regarded as Australia's greatest judge and lawyer.[verification needed]

[edit] Honours

[edit] References

Preceded by
Sir John Latham
Chief Justice of Australia
1952-1964
Succeeded by
Sir Garfield Barwick


Chief Justices of the High Court of Australia

Griffith | Knox | Isaacs | Gavan Duffy | Latham | Dixon | Barwick | Gibbs | Mason | Brennan | Gleeson