User talk:Otherside

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] WP:NOT

Wikipedia is not the place to spread new terminology. Moe ε 14:58, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes, there is terminology pages, but most are wide-spread terminology. Plus, don't removed spedy deletion tags. It is considered vandalism . Moe ε 15:02, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

then come and discuss. dont just add speedy deletion because of YOUR opinion on the matter. -Otherside-

It will someone else decision also when they view the tag if it is worth having or not. Moe ε 15:05, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

exactly my point. no need to lose sleep over it. and where is it that under vandalism that says its vandalism to remove speedy deletion. reverting to POV section... -Otherside-

I think you missed my point. The tag will stay on there until another user sees it and decideds to either delete it or see if it is worth keeping it. Most likely it will be deleted. And removing any tags is considered vandalism. Moe ε 15:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

you sound pretty confident there. i still think your argument is non-sequential, but i guess we shall see. -Otherside-

I already sent you the link, its called vandalism. Removing tags is vandalism. Moe ε 15:21, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Rx StrangeLove 15:23, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

so who removed the page. its been on here for less than an hour. i don't think that is nearly ample time to discuss it. put back the article... as qouted "There are a few limited cases where admins can delete Wikipedia pages or media "on sight" without further debate. Even if listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion or a related page, such pages may be deleted and the discussion ended. Before deleting, an admin should always check the page history to see if any previous version can be restored, such that deletion is not necessary." -otherside-

Apparently, Rx StrangeLove deleted it, he is an admin and probably did check it. When the page is nonsense it can be speedy deleted without discussion. Moe ε 15:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

then perhaps dirty sanchez and others such as that should be removed. he/she should have emailed me FIRST before deleting it.

Acually I didn't. I imagine some admin came a long and deleted it, I didn't see it but that's what generally happens when a speedy deletion tag is applied to an article. Sometimes it happens right away sometimes it takes a while. I didn't see any of the pages at issue here, I was just responding to a vandalsim complaint. Please don't remove those speedy deletion notices...if articles you are adding regularly get tagged like that you probably want to take a look around and see what standards we're using for inclusion. Let me know if you have any question, thanks. Rx StrangeLove 15:35, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. I suppose someone else did. Moe ε 15:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

In response to your message, I don't think you should recreate it. I took a look at it and I don't think it would have any chance at WP:AFD so I'd lay off. Having said that, the deletion summary was db:nonsense which it surely wasn't...people misuse that tag all the time. But...and this is a big but, don't recreate that article. It won't last long and it'll just piss people off. There's a billion billion things to write about, take a shot at something that won't be deleted right away! Rx StrangeLove 15:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)