Talk:Oreopithecus bambolii

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Primates, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use primate resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.

Are there any outside links to support the claims of this article? A date, or even just a year, for when the bones were first found? Who led the expedition?

As it stands, this article is a stub, and for all anyone knows, is a hoax.

Nope, not a hoax. See Mikko's phylogeny page] for some scant information. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:57, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

The name quickly inspired the commonly used name for the species among paleontologists, which is, inevitably, Cookie Monster.

I don't understand. What name? Was there something lost in an earlier edit, or am I missing something? Nik42 22:21, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

The scientific name, Oreopithecus. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Family

Why does wikipedia take sides in a scientific dispute over the origins of this fossile? Is it really in wikipedias interest to take sides? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.185.28.23 (talk • contribs) .

The taxobox is used to give readers a quick overview of the taxonomy and provide quick access to key taxa. The article body itself spells out the questionability of the Oreopithecidae family, as would that article once it gets written. It's appropriate to leave the link in the taxobox and let the more inquisitive reader read further than the taxobox. the question mark I can live with. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] broken external link

The 3rd hot link appears to be inactive. Jbottoms76 16:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Link removed. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)