Talk:Opiliones

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opiliones was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake. Date of review: No date specified. Please edit template call function as follows: {{FailedGA|insert date in any format here}}

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve and expand Wikipedia's coverage of arthropods. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · refresh) The biggest problem with this article is the lack of references. IronChris | (talk) 03:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

The myth mentioned was actually tested by the MythBusters of the Discovery Channel. They found that the venom of daddy long legs is not more lethal than that of a Black Widow spider. Second, the fangs are long enough to pierce the skin. Third, actual intentional infliction of multiple bites caused no significant side effects for a human.

BBC has an interesting article on & photo of one of these in amber. Appartently, it will be pretty important to science.

Actually, the MythBusters tested the Daddy Longlegs spider, not the Harvestmen. 68.48.174.136 04:11, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 ID error in photo 2 Location 3 GA Failed 4 Singular?

[edit] ID error in photo

The photo labeled "Leiobunum politum" is actually Hadrobunus grandis. Note that femur I is much shorter than the length of the body, which is diagnostic for the genus. The unlabeled figure is a male Phalangium opilio.

[edit] Location

What would be really helpful is if it mentioned somewhere where on earth these things are found...

[edit] GA Failed

This article failed the GA noms due to lack of references. Tarret 21:14, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Singular?

What is the singular of Opiliones? Is it Opilione? Or Opiliones?

Is the name Opilionid valid? IronChris | (talk) 02:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi, everybody. The singular should be Opilion. In English it is very common to read "opilionid", but it is just because of the unused form Opilionida. This appeared in an attempt to standardize the ordinal names in the 1940s. But the official name recognized by ISA is Opiliones. --Vae victis 16:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)