Talk:Open Site

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

The content appears to be copyright, however. Hmmmm.... Tannin

Question: Is the MPL GFDL-compatible, or vice-versa?
MPL is a software license, so I would say no. Also this only refers to the code. -- The "Invisible Friend" 19:34 23 Jul 2003 (UTC)

If anyone from the Open Site project is reading this, it would be interesting to know what your licence scheme is, and find ways in which our projects could work together, if possible.

Looking around this seems to be the full license: "If you use Open-Site data, please be sure to add the proper notation to the bottom of each page, available at http://open-site.org/docs/osnote.html." (found on http://open-site.org/help/Using_Our_Data/ ) -- The "Invisible Friend" 19:34 23 Jul 2003 (UTC)

[edit] Useful Link

http://open-site.org/help/Using_Our_Data/

I just added it to the article. Finell (Talk) 01:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Inclusionist doubtful of worthyness

I'm normally an inclusionist, but I wondering why we bother with this site. This slim article on an obscure musician [1] was a featured article. They don't have anything on animals that aren't pets. No lions, no tigers, no bears, oh my... it's silly to keep this lackluster project mentioned. -- user:zanimum

Nonsense. We've kept a lot less notable sites. They're at a lot earlier stage than Wikipedia, and they're an attempt by the DMOZ community - and following the DMOZ model - to create an encyclopedia, which in my book makes them notable alone. It's just that Wikipedia, at this point is time, is crushing them. Ambi 21:41, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../o/p/e/Talk%7EOpen_Site_f54e.html"