Talk:Omar al-Bashir
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] "The Sudan" to "Sudan
Per the Sudan article, it is becoming uncommon to use the definite artile when referring to the country. --Impaciente 17:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
The neutrality of this article is subject to question. Stating that Al Bashir singlehandedly rules Sudan is msininforming. Al Bashir runs the country From within an insitition and is not the sole ruler. Secondly President Al Bashir is not ruling with an iron hand as stated, rather and due to the fact that the other political parties refuse to participate in the goverment or any democratic process of any kind; for thier own agenda; is Al Bashir seen as the only suitable candidate. His economic reform policies have proved by all measures to be success in improving the status of Sudan to one of the strongest economies in Africa. The ruling party in Sudan was able to transfer most Sudanese from below the poverty line to above it although a lot has to be done and what has been done will never be viewed as sufficient. President Al Bashir is of very charismatic character and is considered a highly popular figure among many Sudanese. Yet the nature of Sudanese politics always critisizes the party in power without any attention being payed to the fact that former parties which ruled failed to produce a nation with any economic, political or military status.
I see Sudan's Minister of Information has discovered Wikipedia....
[edit] Aslam-o-Alakum
“When he returned to the Sudan, al-Bashir was put in charge of military operations against the Sudan People's Liberation Army in the southern half of the country”,,, False, false, false and false: Albasir came back to Sudan in 1974, there was no SPLA in Sudan at that time,,, this is the same American propaganda used against Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua, now they use it against Sudan, SPLA is new Contras, most of these propaganda stuff extracted from the CIA work, the funny about it is that make any Sudanese laugh, it just haphazard information used in USA because people DO NOT know nothing, my god!!!!!!!!!
[edit] Even this discussion page has bias information...
In response to the person that commented before this comment...
1. How do you know the person who wrote this article is American?
2. Why do you think from one little thing on this article, you think it is right to judge a whole country?
3. Just because one person may not have their facts straight doesn't mean every American is retarded.
4. So what, we may get a few things wrong here or there, but I'd like you to write an article on the history of the United States and see how many facts you get wrong.
5. And simply, you could have just said what information in this article was incorrect (politely), instead of screaming out that everyone in USA knows nothing.
6. If you really think some of the information is incorrect, then go ahead and edit the article! This is what Wikipedia is for, so people like you who know the correct information can correct the article.
7. If you happen to have something against a certain race, country, person, etc., please don't post your feelings about it here. Go tell some anti-(whatever-you-hate) group, and shout it out over there.
HyperKraz
(I don't know if there is like a moderator or something of Wikipedia that is supposed to post messages like these, but I felt it necessary to say this. I hope Wikipedia doesn't ban me forever for doing this.)
[edit] image of him
can somebody please upload that image of him?. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.175.1.237 (talk) 02:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC).
Categories: Biography articles of living people | Politics and government work group articles | Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles | Unknown-priority biography (politics and government) articles | Military work group articles | Start-Class biography (military) articles | Unknown-priority biography (military) articles | Start-Class biography articles