User:Okyea

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Userboxes

snuk

This user says snuck.

…in.

Ending a sentence with a preposition is something this user is okay with.

(s)he

This user supports parallel usage.

. The

This user does not put two spaces after a full stop.

“…!”

For quotation marks, this user would rather use “American punctuation.”

;	This user is addicted to semicolons; he or she uses them frequently.

ipa-1

This user has a basic understanding of the International Phonetic Alphabet.

en-us-4

This user has a near-native understanding of American English.

fgn-n

This user is a native speaker of foreign.

incl

This user is a Wikipedia inclusionist.

1 Headline
2 τaxa searchnew
3 Structural formulas (formulae?)
4 OKYEA

[edit] Headline

it is very likely that I'm using this page as a sandbox or template repository

I think I just found a solution - a separate page Okyea/Stuff

τασσειη

ΤΣ

ΤΑΣΣΕΙΗ

[edit] τaxa search^new

Taxa Search^New

[edit] Structural formulas (formulae?)

daigremontianin

so I make them as fallows (using only free software)

1. in ACDLABS 10.0 I make the structure manually because I think it messed up something when I gave it the SMILES of a compound to check if it works (i.e. the option generate structure from SMILES)

2. after few mins it should be done and then I save the file as molfile (I'm not sure which type exactly but I'm sure it doesn't affect the final result)

3. I'm saving it before cleaning it up in ACDLABS because it messes everything up if you try to use the clean up option.

4. then I go to this site (I'm not sure what is the name of the molecule editor)

5. then I pick option open in the online molecule editor and through opening it it sort of cleans it up and you get a really pretty structural formula.

6. then I fix something up (I like terminal hydrogens so I add them) then I pick open 2D viewer (so I can save a larger image) and save it as a .png file

7.then I crop it and delete the background in GIMP

TADA!

[edit] OKYEA

as you can see from my headline I'm an inclusionist, I believe that eventually all words could be made internal links and wikipedia would be sum total of all human knowledge.

nevertheless it's reasonable to assume deletion of articles on trivial subjects that the author has failed to source at least in some way (yet again; it's even more reasonable to help the author in finding references).

so it assures that wikipedia would eventually be sum total of all recognized human knowledge.

I oppose the policy of locking away peoples userboxes that are POV, because it assumes peoples incompetence and inability to come to a consensus, POVs fuel wikipedia because people are able to come to a consensus to create the best articles you could possibly ever find.

my interests range from marketing to artificial languages, I mean it's intimidatingly wide range assuming that I need to come to a conclusion what would be this one thing I would want to get a Ph D in. So I'm sort of testing it trough contributing to wikipedia. This far the topics I would most likely want to write articles on are (in particular order):