User talk:Ojw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 22:50, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Helicopter anatomy

Thank you for providing the annotated diagram on this page! If you open the article you will see some hidden notes describing the remainder of the dials and warning lights. Now Wikipedians can pretty much get into a Robinson R22 and fly it away... once you (or someone else) produces a further annotated diagram. Visit the article and you'll see what I mean. Benet Allen 18:15, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] re Christmas

your ( i think it was yours) suggestions were probably O.K., but you had to see where the article came from to get to "Feature" status. Large sections, including much ethnocentric and very detailed stuff, were repackaged and sent off to new sections (try Christmas in the media, for one), and lots of new material was worked in, in a reasonably equitable process. Good spirit shown by all on this holiday.Sfahey 23:02, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] templates

Can you tell me more about "listdev" template (I am new to en:Wiki) thanks Gérard 09:44, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

It's just a "this list is incomplete" template, might be more useful for a list page than "stub", although it's all a matter of style. "listdev" = please add more items to the list, while "stub" = please write more text about this article. Ojw 13:27, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Circuit diagram example ( + Seychelles map)

Thanks! It's now in use. Great work. – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 13:41, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)

And the Seychelles image looks great. I was going to finish this, but I got distracted, reading about how Seychelles fared in the Tsunami. Anyway, thanks! – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 20:58, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)

Hi Ojw, I left a question for you (just curiousity) at Wikipedia:Image recreation requests#Completed requests. dbenbenn | talk 22:52, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Don't know whether I'm supposed to reply on my talkpage or yours. The earth image is pretty common - I got mine from here or here, and xplanet has loads more where that came from.
As to copyright, I haven't found anyone attempting to stop them being used as public-domain images, although they're occasionally found credited to JPL/CalTech. Images are distributed with xplanet for example, which is GPL, and many of those popular websites are displaying them without copyright notices (and have been for decades).
One page says that another page says that Living Earth claimed copyright of a similar image, but I can't find anything to substantiate that. Anyone wanting to dig through and come up with an answer I'd be interested to know, but I'd treat the images as public domain. Ojw 23:29, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] re electronic signature problems

I've left a long reply to your comment at its talk. We might consider confining a meta discussion to one of our talk pages rather than on elec sig's as a serious discussion will very likely encompass more. Are you interested, modulu time available? ww 19:03, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Baseball diagrams

Archived to User:Ojw/Baseball

[edit] Rules of the road map

Hello Ojw. I would do this myself, but I don't seem to have the facility to do so. It's about the map that you've posted at Rules of the road. I've noticed a couple of minor errors or omissions in it, namely:

There may be other oversights that I haven't noticed.

Sorry, I don't mean to be a nitpicker, but I like to see accurate maps. I'm sure you do, too. So if you get a moment, could you change the map? Thanks. Kelisi 03:55, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The countries which are missing completely, there's a good chance that they'll be missing from every wikipedia world map, because we all derive maps from the ones on Wikipedia:Blank_maps
Perhaps you could raise it either on the map page, or on one of the wikipedia helpdesks, because if there's a problem with missing countries it will affect a lot more than just this image (and it can only really be solved by someone capable of regenerating the maps from raw data, not those of us colouring them in). Ojw 17:22, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging

I notice that you've done a lot of work creating images for Wikipedia. Unfortunately, from what I could tell, none of them have tags in accordance with Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags. That means others can't be certain of their copyright statuses. To remedy this, can you go through and tag them. It would be simplest just to make them public domain or GFDL. If you need help, post a message on my talk page. For now, as I see your images, I'll have to mark them {{unverified}}. Thanks for your cooperation. Superm401 20:19, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

OK, show me images that are untagged? Everything in User:Ojw/Gallery is marked - screenshot for screenshots, cc-by for photos, and FDL for diagrams, maps and modfified images. Most of those images received a tag at the moment they were uploaded.
I can see about 86 correctly-tagged images on my contributions page, and I can't see any non-tagged images, which makes the phrase "none of them have tags" seem rather confusing. Ojw 20:54, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] free software = freeware!

Why did you change it? Kmg90 00:08, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

We have two pages: Free Software refers to Free Software (freedom to use, modify, and redistribute the software), while Freeware refers to software which is available at zero-cost.
The first paragraph of the article already mentions that, and provides a disambiguation link to freeware. So regardless of anything else, putting another link would be redundant.
Secondly, whoever changed the article wrote it as "Free Software (Freeware)", implying that the two were equivalent, which they're not. Free software isn't always available at zero cost, and freeware doesn't always allow you to modify and redistribute it.
OK, the concepts of freeware and Free Software sound similar when you first hear them, but they are distinct terms, and that's reflected in us having two pages for them.
Does that sound reasonable, or are there still unanswered questions? Ojw 00:33, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image deletion

Greetings, ojw. Over at the Commons, some images I've uploaded are being considered for deletion. I'd be interested in hearing your honest opinion on the matter there. Thanks! – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 13:07, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Maritime flags

I happened to notice you wanted maritime signal flags. Not being an expert on these, but luck happening as it does, I happened to visit this page earlier in the day, which may have what you want. Burgundavia 03:54, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. They're now at International_maritime_signal_flags. Ojw 20:02, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
India.png didn't upload, so I'll put it up in a minute. kwami 09:18, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Evolution_encryption.png

You might want to fuzzy-out the key ID in Image:Evolution_encryption.png too if you want to protect your privacy, as public key servers allow for searching keys by key ID, which reveals your full name and email address info (ask an admin to delete the old revision after you've uploaded a new one to prevent people from looking at old revisions). If you're just trying prevent people from casually using your email address feel free to ignore me, ofcourse. --Weyes 18:20, 2005 Mar 30 (UTC)

OK let's just ignore it for now and hope it goes away (the email address is published on a website anyway, as is the PGP key). Removed all links to it, so it'll be orphaned eventually. Ojw 16:48, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] "please place pictures better"

Since my screen resolution can't go above 1024x768, I can't seem to be able to resize the page in question to rearrange the images. Does your browser display my reorganization worse than the original? If so, maybe we can come up with a compromise. The problem I had with the old layout is that all them images piled up on the right side, while the text took up about half the height. —Sean κ. + 23:31, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] For Security Reasons

"previous content was unverifiable" - OK, fair enough.

But we're left with "for security reasons" which means nothing at all. A 'weasel phrase'. In real life, you never do something 'for security reasons'.

e.g. when you go on holiday you don't tell your kids to "turn the TV off for security reasons" you say 'turn it off lest it catch fire.' You don't lock your door for security reasons, you lock it to stop burglars getting in. And you don't pixelate a photo for security reasons, you do it to stop somebody deriving information that you're worried about them knowing. Everything has a reason.

So either we have a reason for the pixelated photos or we don't. "Security" isn't a reason. Maybe "..has been pixelated for fear of people seeing it" or nothing at all would be better. Ojw 6 July 2005 20:06 (UTC)

  • I do see your point, and I would agree with you that 'sniper locations' may in fact be a reason they pixellated the photo. However, I am sure that if you asked the satellite imaging company why they pixellated the photo they would tell you that it was done for "Security Reasons". I agree that it is a cop out answer, but I feel it is the correct answer. I do think that the pixellation requires some explanation as it is clearly seen on the photo. That's why I changed the caption.... Gblaz July 6, 2005 20:33 (UTC)

[edit] Rail services VfD

Hi there. I've added Waterloo via Weybridge railway service to the existing VfD for the sake of consistency and expediency. If you feel they should be separate please do feel free to split them up. -Splash 02:04, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Reenactment

Hello, I noticed your reenactment related contributions and wanted to ask you, whether you would be interested in joining the related WikiProject.

As you probably know there's a definite lack of reenactment-related content on Wikipedia and if you have any idea what could be added to the ToDo list or would like to write some articles (or stubs) on missing topics, that'd help a lot.

Cheers. Ashmodai 08:31, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Albini

I don't know, seems like one of the articles edited by you seems a bit slanderous to me. Any reason for the criticism of the Albini's? - 194.152.88.110

Did you have a question? I assume you're talking about the Albini Household article, which seems to have been vandalised by someone* in favour of promoting the "leathernecks" group? Ojw 11:23, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
* 'someone' being the anonymous contributor at 81.98.161.161

[edit] Your comments on Talk:BitTorrent

I agree with your comments on the inclusion of the legality of BitTorrent. I made similar arguments several months ago, but they were reverted some time after I removed the 'legal issues' section. Multiple members of the community reverted them, but none made any response to my arguments. My attempts at compromise were also ignored :-( I honestly don't know what to do, just letting you know that I've tried to remove those sections myself, and the experience has soured me on editing Wikipedia as a whole. :-(

OK, will look back at the page. I assume you're referring to "if we mention the illegal uses of BitTorrent, then to be consistant, we should mention the illegal uses of every other tool on Wikipedia" argument? Ojw 12:44, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] List of accounting software

Just wanted to say a short thank you for moving all those links from accounting software to List of accounting software. Very much overdue! I wanted to do it all the while but didn't get around. Thanks, --S.K. 14:31, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Map of Swiss cantons

Hi; your otherwise nice-looking map of the Swiss cantons unfortunately contains some rather confusing errors and isn't really usable in this state (I removed it from the two articles where it was used, for the time being). Please see Image_talk:Swiss_cantons_brown.png for a list of the errors. I'm sure it is easy to fix :-) Gestumblindi 17:33, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] NetSuite

Hi, I saw you have contributed a to the NetSuite article. Can you please comment in the NetSuite talk page? -- From User:SleepyHead

Sleepyhead, please do not enlist the help of sockpuppets on this issue. Even if others add this topic back for you, the fact is that your application is not notable. - Sleepnomore 16:18, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
A careful human contributor might be expected to note that a change of capitalisation, to a single character, to bypass a redirect page (even if I forgot to mark it as 'minor') doesn't normally require great reams of documentation. However, the edit war on the NetSuite page did catch my attention, and it's a page whose edits I'll be watching more closely in future. Ojw 16:39, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image deletion

Image deletion warning Image:Alu adder.sxd has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Listed under Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2005 September 12. Thunderbrand 21:14, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Don't be evil

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Blackcap | talk 20:37, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

My apologies, I hadn't realized that that was Google's corporate motto. Ignore previous post. --Blackcap | talk 22:50, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] GNU Lilypond article

Thanks for the reminder that Lilypond can use a GUI - it's been a while since I tried it!

Best wishes,
David Kernow 20:49, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Federal Standard 1037C clean up

I saw your post on talk page of Federal Standard 1037C and I thought you might be interested. Renata3 03:53, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] commons

I am surprised that no one has suggested that you should upload images to the Commons so that other language Wikis can share them. You can still provide a detailed image description here with a geograph tag or other local wikilinks, if you want. (See for example Image:Ribble Link 04c216.jpg with a description containing several Wikilinks.) -- RHaworth 13:31, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Well spotted! I'll move some images over. will eventually try to remember. Ojw 19:08, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] References

Hello! I noticed that Web application framework doesn't have any references or sources. Although the contents of that article do seem like "common knowledge", it would still be helpful if you could mention your sources. Many thanks, Lupin|talk|popups 03:05, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:GeographBristolCoverageDec05.png

Thanks for uploading Image:GeographBristolCoverageDec05.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

This question has been posted on the original website's discussion forum. It's a screenshot of a Creative Commons website which is displaying some information by permission of Ordnance Survey, so will probably be web-screenshot. Ojw
Update: the web-editors of geograph.org.uk claim copyright on the image, although it's created from data provided by contributors to that website, who in turn get the data by reading it off Ordnance Survey maps. So marked it as web-screenshot use, since it's being used in a critical discussion of the geograph website. Ojw 23:33, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Victor Davis Hanson

I've edited the article; I hope I've fixed things. See also my talk page and Talk:Victor Davis Hanson. (Feel free to delete this note.) Regards, Chris Chittleborough 16:07, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Knots template

Hi,
I've started using your template {{knot-details}}. I've placed your talk page on my watchlist, so you may reply right here, to keep the discussion all in one place. --Smack (talk) 05:20, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I'm trying to shape up Wikipedia:WikiProject Knots. Johan Andersson 08:21, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:McGoohan.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:McGoohan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Shyam (T/C) 21:24, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Modification of another image already on Wikipedia (see link on image page) - if the original turns out to be a copyright problem, then so will the cropped version of it that I made. Ojw 23:23, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Battle of Hastings reenactment.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Battle of Hastings reenactment.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -SCEhardT 15:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Bedford new slippy OSM.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Bedford new slippy OSM.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:04, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quenya

Hello, Ojw! I like your translations for wikipedia in Quenya, but your tengwar pictures are wrong! You use Sindarin way of writing - vowels being read first, and then the consonants, but usual Quenya reading is tengwar first and then tehtar. There are several people interested in a wikipedia in Quenya (see voting on Meta), and I think that we should make a test wikipedia in Incubator. --George D. Bozovic 12:29, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Curry Village

Hi Ojw, what was wrong with my restructuring of the Curry Village page ? You appear to have deleted all the information I got from their site - AlMa

The website claims that its text is copyrighted - "© 2003 Delaware North Companies Parks & Resorts at Yosemite, Inc.". Are we allowed to publish that text? Ojw 22:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Ah, I see. So the policy here to obtain factual information from the source would be to acquire the information from their official site and then rewrite it here but somehow change the order or phrasing ? Any help greatly appreciated - AlMa
There's a bit of an explanation on Wikipedia:Copyright_FAQ. I'm not sure that swapping words around will help, it's probably better to write the information in your own words, rather than starting with something copyrighted and trying to modify it. Ojw 22:52, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Picture framing.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Picture framing.png. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 11:17, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prod Gpsbabel

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Gpsbabel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Gpsbabel. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hu 02:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Alu adder 5.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Alu adder 5.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Cburnett 07:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:HaloIslandScreenshot.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:HaloIslandScreenshot.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


A tag has been placed on PHProjekt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J Di 17:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)