Talk:Odalisque

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Odalisque article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. Please visit the project page if you would like to participate. Happy editing!
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	To-do list for Odalisque:	edit  · history  · watch  · refresh
No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category

Note: Part of this article is taken from the public domain 1913 edition of Webster's Dictionary. -- Karada 16:09, 4 Dec 2003 (UTC)

[edit] Concubine or not?

An odalisque was a female slave or concubine in the Ottoman Seraglio […] An odalisque was not a concubine of the harem

Ian Spackman 09:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Images

Currently there are two images, both depicting the European orientalist erotic fantasy version of the odalisque. This seems out of balance considering how controversial and discredited this form of bourgeois pornography has become, gorgeous though the paintings are. Surely a single image of such a painting would be more appropriate, ideally set against another image representing a very different point of view. Ireneshusband 18:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC)