User talk:Ocatecir/Archive3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Image:Soggybiscuit.jpg listed for deletion 2 Wikipedia:WikiProject Jackass 3 Please check out some anonymous user's recent contributions to the Steve-O article 4 please 5 Response to your comment re: the proposed delete of the Vita Craft article 6 Soap opera 7 hye 8 WP:TENNIS 9 i made Billy Karren?= 10 Alma mater of UCSD Template 10.1 Primary Colors (Present Scheme) 10.2 Secondary Yellows and Secondary Cool Blues 10.3 Secondary Yellows and Secondary Warm Blues

[edit] Image:Soggybiscuit.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Soggybiscuit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. furrykef (Talk at me) 12:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Holy shit. Nice diagram dude :) Deiz talk 13:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Jackass

• How do you fancy starting WP:JACKASS as a sister project to WP:CKY? I think :CKY has been positive and this would be a good move... I'll give you first call on founding it, partly because I don't want to be seen as trying to own this genre on Wikipedia... If you don't fancy it then no worries, I'll give it a whirl and I'm sure you'll be up for joining. Nice one, Deiz talk 13:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

I like the way you do business :) Deiz talk 13:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please check out some anonymous user's recent contributions to the Steve-O article

Hello, User 216.73.65.63 has made a couple of contributions to the Steve-O article today. I suspect they may not be constructive. Please check it out. Thanks. Itayb 20:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] please

please warn khokloi for to stop vandalism again Turkic identity in wiki texts —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.233.18.59 (talk) 09:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Response to your comment re: the proposed delete of the Vita Craft article

"Sources do not meet criteria of substantial independent work or multiple non-trivial works" The two following links, [1] & [2] are non trivial and completely independent from Vita Craft; furthermore, they do not reference RFIQin and they both provide substantial amount of information, more than what is required according to WP:ORG#Primary criterion, which qualifies this company as notable. Do you feel that the two companies that I referenced are trivial and somehow connected to Vita Craft? I would like to know, because to my knowledge these web sites qualify as notablity under wikipedia guidelines. I just want to know why there web sites are unacceptable. Thanks. -ChristopherMannMcKay 04:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Responded on AFD page. —Ocatecir ^Talk 00:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Soap opera

Hi. User:Danfling keeps making major changes to soap opera. Apparently based on the idea that only shows made in New York can be called soap operas, Danfling keeps removing anything in the article connected to any show not produced in that city. It seems odd to me; I have never heard of this concept that only shows made in NYC can be called soap operas. What can be done apart from constantly reverting the changes? Format 01:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Responded on user talk page. —Ocatecir ^Talk 09:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] hye

please dont delete Kedah FA page... i'm so sorry for my behaviour please —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Syed awan (talk • contribs).

i'm so sorry about my behaviour please i dont know how to do explain my information from malay language to english. Kedah FA information all is true and full of information. for their players...i will find the information to recover it.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Syed awan (talk • contribs).

Responded on talk page. Again, no one added a deletion template to Kedah FA. —Ocatecir ^Talk 07:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Please clean up for ahmad fauzi shaari page,k.soley page,shafiq jamal page,muhymeen page and all player page i've edited....i will try to find about their information soon! thanx Kedah is my state and my football team=) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Syed awan (talk • contribs) 07:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] WP:TENNIS

You mind telling me why you reverted my edits? They were obviously not vandalism. --KZ ^{Talk • Vandal • Contrib} 07:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Responded on User talk page. —Ocatecir ^Talk 07:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] i made Billy Karren?=

i didn't create that page actually. you can put the "speedy deletion" thing back on tho if you really like it that much —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.71.140.42 (talk • contribs).

[edit] Alma mater of UCSD Template

Hello. I realize that the colors that I changed do appear to be the colors of UCLA. However, I did research the actual color usage which is officially designated by UCSD. My findings showed that UCSD's primary colors are Pantone Blue 285 and Pantone Gold 122. You can find the colors listed in UCSD Graphic Identity Print Guidelines: Section 4: Graphic Elements. If you skip to page 6, you will find the correct color information. I have reverted back to my edit to reflect this. If you have any other questions or concerns, or if you believe that I am still unjustified, please leave me a message on my talk page. Thank You! --Sukh17 ^{T • C • E} 06:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

While the colors may technically match up with UCSD's original intent, they do not look like the colors alums are familiar with. Never once have I seen any UCSD apparel in those colors. Everyone seemed fine with the previous colors, and my philosophy is, if it ain't broke don't fix it. The new colors do not look like UCSD's. Please change it back. —Ocatecir ^Talk 06:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Again, please look at the color scheme of Tritonlink —Ocatecir ^Talk 06:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

• I currently attend UCSD, and I know that the use of these colors is a fact. In fact, if you read through the Graphic Identity Guidelines and Policies, which outlines the use of the UCSD logo and the colors that should be associated with the University, it is official policy to use the colors that are designated by the Guidelines. Additionally, these are not especially new guidelines, as they have been in place since at least 2001 according the revision of the Guidelines. It is likely that they have been in place before that time too. I hope we can resolve this issue without one of us having to feel completely unsatisfied. Thank You! --Sukh17 ^{T • C • E} 06:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

TritonLink is in fact undergoing a revision. I believe that its color scheme will possibly be changing. --Sukh17 ^{T • C • E} 06:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I've done a comparison for you and I none of the colors match. The Blue needs to be brought down a few shades.(See image) —Ocatecir ^Talk 07:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

• Please observe the note at the bottom of page 5. The colors are not exact representations of what is shown. I have done my best in researching and using a conversion chart to get the Hex codes for the Pantone colors. --Sukh17 ^{T • C • E} 07:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I have created the following different versions which also are supposed to mimic the color usage denoted by the University. If you can find me a more accurate conversion chart than the one that I am using, I would appreciate it. I hope you find one of these appealing.

[edit] Primary Colors (Present Scheme)

[edit] Secondary Yellows and Secondary Cool Blues

[edit] Secondary Yellows and Secondary Warm Blues

--Sukh17 ^{T • C • E} 07:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I just noticed that you were comparing to the wrong template. The Pantone Blue 287 is part of the University of California scheme, as you can see denoted by the lettering UC. The appropriate UCSD scheme, denoted by the UCSD lettering, is with Pantone Blue 285, which I have chosen correctly. Thanks! --Sukh17 ^{T • C • E} 07:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

• Problem solved. —Ocatecir ^Talk 07:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)