Talk:Oakley, Inc.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Fashion WikiProject. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks! |
||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
||
| Low | This article is on a subject of low-importance within fashion. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
Everything after the first two lines is extremely NPOV - it sounds like a press release from Oakley. I'm going to revert to the Sep 5 2004 version. --NegativeK 17:43, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
For such distinctly minor corporations to be encyclopedic, some history, some cultural context, some meaning beyond the mere fact of existence is essential. Wikipedia is not a Yellow pages. --Wetman 02:07, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Would it be suitable perhaps to list some of the more popular models, or media references to the glasses? Other possibilites would be lense technology or its military/swat use. For as much of a cultural icon as it is, it should have a somewhat more hearty article than a simple stub.--Alfador 06:23, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright vio
I'm reverting to the version of 13 September due to copyright vio: [1]. Edwardian 03:51, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Link to C5=
The link to the substance C5 goes to a disambiguation page, and nothing on the disambiguation page covers this substance. Should the link be removed? Harksaw
