User talk:NovaSTL

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello, NovaSTL, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Contents

[edit] BAMF

Did you read Talk:BAMF. I'm reverting your change, because there was no consensus to do so. Feel free to bring up your issues on the talk page McKay 23:26, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You and the bot

Possibly the '''Bold text''' included in your edit made the bot jump. Agathoclea 11:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What'd a simple approval process be?

I noted your comment about "an elaborate approval process" for stub types. "Elaborate" in what way? Alai 02:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

That sounds to me like a pretty simple approval process (though more elaborate than no process at all, I'll grant you). Though perhaps I'm just habituated to the WSS ways of doing things. Alai 02:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sahaja Yoga

It would greatly help if you actually knew what you were doing when you go on your 'patrolling' eg. the mess you've made of the Sahaja Yoga page. Sahajhist 04:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] KidsRights Foundation

Hi there!

I have been working on improving the article on KidsRights Foundation to address some of the concerns that you raised. Unlike the original author, I am myself not in any way affiliated with this organisation.

Under sources I have listed a few of the many Dutch and English-language sources for information on KidsRights.

I have gone ahead and removed the nn, primarysources and wikify tags you added.

Btw, I will also work on the International Children's Peace Prize article shortly.

Take care,

Jorrit van Hertum

Jvhertum 15:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Re-adding questionable content time and time again without discussion can be considered Vandalism: "Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia". Since you refuse to discuss the issue (despite multiple requests), your edits can only be considered bad-faith edits.

Please read Wikipedia:Resolving_disputes "First Step". Sfacets 02:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Adding a link to the University of Virginia's "Religious Movements Homepage Project"[1], as a reference at the article on Sahaja Yoga, is not vandalism.[2] Please do not abuse warning templates. --NovaSTL 02:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
It isn't a warning, or a template. Sfacets 02:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Also, Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism is not a place to settle content disputes. Also you left no warnings on my talk page. Sfacets 02:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome back

No special problems. Sfacets is semi-away, so things have quieted down at Sahaja Yoga. I've asked him to participate in mediation when he returns. Otherwise all is well - the usual Wikipedia chaos. Cheers, -Will Beback · † · 09:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jiri Petr

Dear NovaSTL please check the changes on page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiri_Petr and help a "beginner" Thanks user:raupp

[edit] Canard revert?

I noticed your revert to Canard...do you realize that by doing that we now have Canard and Canard (aeronautics) which are almost identical? I think the objective of the previous editor was to segregate the aeronautical term, and make the plain "canard" page into a true disambig. I'm curious why you are objecting? Akradecki 06:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem. It looked to me like the guy who did that is very new, and didn't understand how to properly set up a disambig page. You might want to have a look at his disambig listing in ref to his other edits...I'm wondering if there's some POV pushing involved. Thanks much for the quick response! Akradecki 06:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks much! Akradecki 17:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../n/o/v/User_talk%7ENovaSTL_17b0.html"