User talk:Normalmouth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
  1. Archive 1

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Welsh labour.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Welsh labour.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] TfD nomination of Template:False accuser

Template:False accuser has been nominated for deletion. This template was created by a user to counter false allegations of sockpuppetry. I hope you feel this deserves your support. Please comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Mallimak 20:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Interested?

Would you be interested in posting here? It may be of interest to you. Jhamez84 20:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Suggestion

Hi. I would suggest that you and User talk:Lenincymru2007 try to avoid one another for a little while. You both need a cooling-off period, and I don't like to see your edit war moving from one article to another. As the experienced user, you should take the lead and show him how compromise can be achieved. Deb 22:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Deb. Good suggestion. I have made some very significant compromises on the Plaid Cymru article tonight and accepted his edit on Welsh Labour in full (though I have moved it), So I hope we can deal on this basis. I will now take the opportunity to cool off. Tks. Normalmouth 22:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
I think it would be fine to include the stated "aims of the party" and also the manifesto points verbatim from the Plaid Cymru website. Anything else might be a bit dodgy. Deb 16:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Plaid Cymru

Be aware that it's possible that this LeninCymru user could be a "Cyber-bully". I dislike his user-page being unedited. Amlder20 18:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. Lenincymru2007 is a new contributor and potentially has much to contribute to Wikipedia. I need to try and find a way to work productively with him and to convey that, where something has been well sourced (e.g from reliable academic sources as you suggest), there needs to be a proper reason (i.e beyond his general feeling that he doesn't like it) for it to be removed or edited. His input into the Plaid Cymru article has obliged me to do more reading, research into the party's history and improve the article; now that I have I find it more than a little frustrating to find him dumping meticulously sourced references because he misguidedly thinks they show the party in a bad light (as if that was ever the criteria). To that end, I would value enormously someone who could give a view on whether some or all of the disputed edits should stand. Can you help?

Neo-facism The source you cite may have an inherit bias and agenda as well. In fact, because of their use of the word neo-facism out of context it begs the question weather one could trust anything else from Morgan, K O, Drachenfyre 08:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

You are clearly unaware of the work of Kenneth Morgan, one of the most respected Welsh political historians. I suggest you review some of his output. Normalmouth 08:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../n/o/r/User_talk%7ENormalmouth_b6df.html"