Northern Territory referendum, 1998

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Northern Territory referendum, 1998
Statehood for NT Vote %
No 51.9
Yes 48.1

A referendum was held in the Northern Territory on Saturday October 3, 1998, to decide whether the Territory should become a State of the Commonwealth of Australia. The Country Liberal Party government, and its federal counterpart, supported the Yes case. The opposition Australian Labor Party supported the No case.

The referendum was narrowly defeated, 51.9% to 48.1%. The "Yes" case received 44,702 votes, the "No" case 48,241. There were 1068 informal ballots.

The result was widely interpreted as a personal rebuke to then Chief Minister Shane Stone. Polls suggest that most Territorians continue to support statehood for the territory in principle.

[edit] Background

The territory has a legislative assembly. Whilst this assembly exercises roughly the same powers as the governments of the states of Australia, it does so by delegation of powers from the commonwealth government, rather than by any constitutional right.

For several years there has been agitation for full statehood. A referendum was held on the issue in 1998, which failed. This was a shock to both the Northern Territory and Commonwealth governments, for opinion polls showed most Territorians supported statehood. However, under the Australian Constitution, the Federal government may set the terms of entry to full statehood. The Northern Territory was offered three Senators, rather than the twelve guaranteed to original states. (Because of the difference in populations, equal numbers of Senate seats would mean a Territorian's vote for a Senator would have been worth more than 30 votes in New South Wales or Victoria.) Alongside what was cited as an arrogant approach adopted by then Chief Minister Shane Stone, it is believed that most Territorians were reluctant to adopt the offer which was made.

A bipartisan NT Legislative Assemby Committee, chaired by former Chief Minister Stephen Hatton, had proposed a draft Constitution and that it should be debated at an elected Constitutional Convention. Shane Stone ignored the latter recommendation, nominating a Convention membership of 53 members at short notice, and then presented to the Convention a draft Constitution that was different from the Committee's recommendation.[1] Steve Hatton later said "one of the campaign slogans at the time was, we want statehood, not Stonehood". [1]

[edit] References

  1. ^ a b ABC Lateline Discussion]